freebear

5 ms·

1.
by freebear 6y ago
Are you saying that the ones who take this pandemic serious also take the "ghastly future of mass extinction" serious? I oppose this 100%, I take the "ghastly future of mass extinction" very serious and my solution would
2.
by freebear 7y ago
Oh, such techno-utopianism, cheer the tech!! Sweden still has increased death rates due to Chernobyl, this disaster is still killing by a statistical significance, if we make it to the future we could forget it and later remind ourselves by
3.
by freebear 7y ago
https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/brain-damage-in-fis... Minimal health risk...
4.
by freebear 7y ago
Air travel is such a non issue, for any person flying it will of course be a large part of their carbon footprint, but the atmosphere does not care where the CO2 came from. https://insideclimatenews.org/sites/default&#x
5.
by freebear 7y ago
4k? "They" can come up with any number they want to, some say it is as low as 28, counting only the dead firefighters. I live in the worst fallout area in Sweden and our nature is still very radioactive. Cancer rates here are of c
6.
by freebear 7y ago
Thriving? https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/april-27-2019-oilsands-emiss... They are f'd, their DNA is also f'd so...
7.
by freebear 7y ago
The risk of abrupt methane release in the east siberian arctic shelf: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx1Jxk6kjbQ This graph is more fun but not up to date https://www.methanelevels.org/
8.
by freebear 7y ago
Methane lifetime in the atmosphere is 11 years, if we "only" put as much in as eleven years ago it will go flat. Pretty hard to keep the curve up if we do not get help from the permafrost which has an enormous amount of methane lo
9.
by freebear 7y ago
If you eat our food, if you compete with our food, or if you live close to our food: we will kill you.
10.
by freebear 7y ago
"The average 2-5 year old is spending over 1,600 hours a year watching television." "Saves kids", yeah right. Must be just great to spend all that time in front of the tellie eaten em tater chips and drinkin that mountai
11.
by freebear 7y ago
"Google, Audi, Carbon Engineering, Global Thermostat, Climeworks, and labs at universities and national labs have all done it before us. What no one has been able to do so far is do it at a low enough cost to compete with fossil fuel.&
12.
by freebear 8y ago
Top clueless moron technotopian article of 2018. "How did we humans manage to build a global civilization on the cusp of colonizing other planets?" No, we are on the cusp of climatological, ecological, environmental and economical
13.
by freebear 8y ago
Tap water is about the same, old one: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/06/plastic-... This is just our devouring of the planet, nothing to see here. Now reinsert head in ass and press pla
14.
by freebear 9y ago
"At the same time, environmental quality in the First World has improved dramatically." I do not know where to begin, but i am facing the tongue of our mother culture. I am facing not only your arguments, i am facing an operating
15.
by freebear 9y ago
Look at the chart, the numbers are correct, everything grows (in large amounts). We are about to double the amount of fossil fueled cars in the next 10-15 years. It will not matter how much solar we install if we keep increasing our fossi
16.
by freebear 9y ago
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610457/at-this-rate-its-g...