Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
frde_me
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
frde_me
8d ago
It's not that you're a d*, it's just that you lack any kind of nuance There's a whole spectrum between self-hosting open weight models and having a cloud provider swap models from under you Should you self host a model
2.
▲
by
frde_me
1mo ago
Knowing how to break into someone else's network will make you a lot better at making your own network secure.
3.
▲
by
frde_me
2mo ago
> what semi-celebrity they like the most The language in question here is maintained by a BDFL, which means that one person has outsized influence on the language, and it's direction. In this context, I find it reasonable that if so
4.
▲
by
frde_me
3mo ago
That's something for us and benchmarks to decide However it definitly isn't _just_ Kimi. The weight will be different after that 85% of extra training on top of the base model. If those different weights are better are worse doesn
5.
▲
by
frde_me
3mo ago
Replied on the other comment about this, but putting it here: > See here https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5 > 85% of the compute for the final model is from them, and not the base Kimi model. Of course they cou
6.
▲
by
frde_me
3mo ago
See here https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5 85% of the compute for the final model is from them, and not the base Kimi model.
7.
▲
by
frde_me
3mo ago
Calling it an IDE is under-representing cursor They have in-house models, and the data to train even more powerful ones. The cursor team is a proper AI lab.
8.
▲
by
frde_me
3mo ago
I can understand words, but having more diverse medias for communication lets a person express strictly more than before. Sometimes words are better, sometimes a visual demo is better. Is your solution to the problem you presented that you
9.
▲
by
frde_me
3mo ago
I honestly much prefer this to the old way where the only mode of communication was speech or text. I now often understand a lot more holistically what the person coming with their product wants with just a demo + a conversation. Of course
10.
▲
by
frde_me
3mo ago
I'm guessing the parent is wondering why this is noteworthy enough to be posted and discussed in this thread, and so if there's context they are missing
11.
▲
by
frde_me
4mo ago
Even before AI, deterministic checks by compilers are almost always better than "review the code" "review the code" as a solution will eventually fail and cause a problem, even pre-AI.
12.
▲
by
frde_me
4mo ago
The cool thing is the author doesn't actually have to convince anyone
13.
▲
by
frde_me
5mo ago
Going on an old legacy website, downloading reports, summarizing them, and then doing things based on those Or basically any app without MCP capabilities I ask the AI daily to summarize information across surfaces, and it's painful whe
14.
▲
by
frde_me
5mo ago
I enabled the computer use plugin yesterday. Today I asked it to summarize a slack thread, along with a spreadsheet without thinking about it I was expecting it to use MCPs I have for them, but they happened to not be authenticated for some
15.
▲
by
frde_me
6mo ago
Aren't you describing why they use mixture of experts? Where a sub-set of weights are activated depending on the query?
16.
▲
by
frde_me
6mo ago
Out of curiosity, are there any sources to there being a significant amount of other steps before being fed into the weights Security guards / ... are the obvious ones, but do you mean they have branching early on to shortcut certain p
17.
▲
by
frde_me
6mo ago
So it's intentional to make people pass down raw strings versus making the communication safe(er) by default?
18.
▲
by
frde_me
7mo ago
One could argue a smaller number of employees that are more motivated and feel connected to their coworkersis better than a more employees that are all isolated and "meh".
19.
▲
by
frde_me
7mo ago
You see, in my circles (me included), people are shifting _to_ codex since 5.3 codex came out. The only places where I hear people say claude is better is: - Frontend design - Random computer use tasks But people trust codex for large scale
20.
▲
by
frde_me
7mo ago
> I get it that in 10 years all of this might peak and we're gonna be content using old models I would personally be happy using gpt 5.3 codex for the foreseeable future, with just improvements in harnesses IMO we're already at
21.
▲
by
frde_me
7mo ago
What exact models were you using? And with what settings? 4.6 / 5.3 codex both with thinking / high modes?
22.
▲
by
frde_me
7mo ago
It's hard to explain, but I've found LLMs to be significantly better in the "review" stage than the implementation stage. So the LLM will do something and not catch at all that it did it badly. But the same LLM asked to
23.
▲
by
frde_me
8mo ago
My reaction in that case is that most other readers of the codebase would probably also assume this, and so it should be either made clearer that it's stateful, or it should be refactored to not be stateful
24.
▲
by
frde_me
8mo ago
I mean, I'm shipping a vast majority of my code nowadays with Opus 4.5 (and this isn't throwaway personal code, it's real products making real money for a real company). It only fails on certain types of tasks (which by now I
25.
▲
by
frde_me
8mo ago
If it did, would it change its usefulness in terms of the value it outputs? (through agreed, if I had to pay money it would increase the cost, and so the tradeoff)
26.
▲
by
frde_me
8mo ago
I feel like my calculator improves my math solutions. If you take away my calculator, I'll probably be worse at math than I was before. That doesn't mean I'm not better off with my calculator however.
27.
▲
by
frde_me
9mo ago
> He had a son with severe Autism and Microsoft's health benefits were very important to him. This really sucks for him. Through should Microsoft _not_ layoff specific people due to health conditions? Is that something we require fr
28.
▲
by
frde_me
9mo ago
He quite literally has designed puzzles live on stream, yet you conclude he hasn't.
29.
▲
by
frde_me
10mo ago
Okay what we're saying is slightly different, you mean to reach a certain bar. I kind of agree to that Through the marginal improvement is still pretty high to knowing how the tools work and how to use them more effectively, in a way t
30.
▲
by
frde_me
10mo ago
I would argue that for all of these there's still a skill element evolved. If I give an accountant an electronic calculator and a problem to solve, they'll be more efficient than me If I give someone who spent thousands of hours o
More ›