franklyworks

5 ms·

1.
by franklyworks 9mo ago
I am a privacy advocate, and also am disappointed at how narrow minded some of the arguments of privacy advocates are. "Banning encrypted chat will just mean the bad people moved to banned platforms". Perhaps, but some bad people
2.
by franklyworks 9mo ago
Ah, this makes sense.
3.
by franklyworks 9mo ago
Android supports SLAAC and has good support transitional tech like xlat464 and DHCP option 108. I have used these on my network and office to move to IPv6-only for Android. What about lack of DHCPv6 prevents you from using IPv6 on Android?
4.
by franklyworks 9mo ago
Time engineers are very paranoid. I expect large problems can't occur due to a single provider misbehaving.
5.
by franklyworks 9mo ago
Any thoughts on what to extent GitHub is subsidizing OSS development with its CI? This feels like one of the big issues that OSS projects might face when migrating to an alternative. What might a less GitHub centric CI ecosystem look like f
6.
by franklyworks 9mo ago
Runner price based on CPU/memory and time makes sense, since those are the costs associated with executing runners. The costs for GitHub doing action workflows (excluding running) is less related to job duration. The most charitable in
7.
by franklyworks 9mo ago
This was probably the question to ask before declaring it all as junk.
8.
by franklyworks 9mo ago
The kernel has mainline support, but it looks a fork is used by most images. https://git.sr.ht/~hrdl/linux/log/v6.17-rc5_pinenote has many commits.
9.
by franklyworks 9mo ago
I see their repo[0] mentions transitioning to the Pinenote. I'd like to run an ordinary distribution on my Pinenote. Does anyone know what the mainline support is like nowadays, and whether widely packaged software can make it usable a