francoispiquard

4 ms·

1.
by francoispiquard 8mo ago
There is wisdom in the crowd but yes agreed
2.
by francoispiquard 9mo ago
For context, currently a faang IC. I am trying to get that "plus" to founder and investors indeed.
3.
by francoispiquard 9mo ago
The amount is quite low, so really not there. No investors, all bootstrapped.
4.
Ask HN: How to Make the Most of an Acquisition?
3 points by francoispiquard 9mo ago|4 comments
5.
by francoispiquard 9mo ago
Funny I had the same idea just now and wanted to validate it to see if anyone was working on it! Your links on the bottom of the page are broken, but the landing page looks amazing
6.
LLM guidelines, do you have the same pblm
2 points by francoispiquard 9mo ago|1 comments
7.
by francoispiquard 9mo ago
The fact that we are talking about it here (and offline - had that discussion with a colleague) means that they are getting what they want --> attention It's lame but it works
8.
by francoispiquard 9mo ago
IMO as soon as the investment dry this is going to be seen as "smart" and "grounded" but it should have been the only way of doing. Having VC gamble on start-up all the time is just not sustainable. If a product is not g
9.
by francoispiquard 9mo ago
I think they are trying too much to have you jump on GCP. Having a simpler UI with a credit limit (maybe even at a different rate) would actually get more people to use it imo.
10.
by francoispiquard 9mo ago
Seems like a good idea, is it the same kind of concept as the woodpecker method in chess ?
11.
by francoispiquard 9mo ago
Not OP but I think it's a bit harsh on flask tbh. If you want to validate a product or run with a few K users (which I think this is helping), I really think that flask is a proven WS framework that just works.