fragsworth

6 ms·

1.
Insulting Agents Considered Harmful(reddit.com)
2 points by fragsworth 12d ago|0 comments
2.
by fragsworth 3mo ago
Are we sure the prices in these charts are sustainable prices? Is it possible that Grok may be subsidizing a lot more of the costs than the other models, to produce growth metrics, due to the recent SpaceX IPO?
3.
by fragsworth 9mo ago
> For the folks who have more positive outlooks how often do you change your code after it's been generated? Every time, unless my initial request was perfectly outlined in unambiguous pseudocode. It's just too easy to write am
4.
by fragsworth 1y ago
The party in charge generally decides the content of the bills they choose to vote on. It's the party in charge that wrote a bill they knew that no Democrats could accept.
5.
by fragsworth 2y ago
They only care about certain murders.
6.
by fragsworth 2y ago
On one hand you have the richest man on earth purchasing one of the largest social platforms, and singlehandedly wielding it to subvert American democracy. On the other hand you have a guy who kinda liked crypto. You call it "basically
7.
by fragsworth 2y ago
It seems like a potential solution would be training the LLM using two separate buckets. It just needs to internalize the two types of things as being separated (data vs. instruction), so if the training data always separates them, you coul
8.
by fragsworth 2y ago
You could embed your encrypted messages in legitimate looking images, or any other type of file. There's no way to stop it.
9.
by fragsworth 2y ago
This is a typical knee-jerk reaction to a perfectly reasonable law that gets taken out of context and twisted to become ragebait. The law applies to all LGBTQ+ identities, the most common being lesbian/gay, but trans is also part of it
10.
by fragsworth 2y ago
> At a glance it looks like it's not going to affect AI projects that are basically consumers of existing models, which is most projects. If it affects the base projects (especially the open source ones like Llama) then it affects t
11.
by fragsworth 2y ago
If that didn't happen, and the ISPs started profiting off non-net-neutral tactics, it could have been permanently fucked. Once someone depends on a legal source of income, if that source of income gets banned in the future, they genera
12.
by fragsworth 2y ago
You're way overdramatizing this. Tiktok has already been banned in several countries (like India) for similar reasons and without any of the catastrophe you're suggesting. People can and will switch platforms, it's not that b
13.
by fragsworth 2y ago
> Rock is self aware of being a rock But how did you define the rock? Are you saying every set of particles is self aware of being that set of particles?
14.
by fragsworth 3y ago
This was all really we needed to do. It's so frustrating what travel has become
15.
by fragsworth 3y ago
I didn't read any outrage in the article either. Also I don't think any less of Google after reading it.
16.
by fragsworth 3y ago
GPT4. Everyone uses it to do software engineering now and the people who developed it are responsible for that.
17.
by fragsworth 3y ago
At least this guy is being honest about the context: > They are smart people. About that I have no doubt. But I’ve seen how they treat rules. I know what they think of ethics. Also: > I have never met Sam, and I have only met Greg a c
18.
by fragsworth 3y ago
Usually the only good reason is because you already have developed lot of experience with with it. I'm just saying it's not as bad because it's quite a bit easier to switch a database than to switch a game engine.
19.
by fragsworth 3y ago
> DynamoDB, MongoDB, Elasticsearch, AWS Lambda, Azure, AWS, Azure Devops, SqlServer, Oracle, etc. At least with these individual tools, it's usually not your entire codebase written around that thing. For instance, you can generally
20.
by fragsworth 3y ago
This site is full of people who are in a tech rat race, and the distribution has changed over time. It's now biased largely against crypto, and for reasons that I think are fairly clear: Most of the users who would have agreed with you
21.
by fragsworth 3y ago
Are you joking? I can't really tell. Chocolate? Do you think girl scouts are scumbags too?
22.
MyHouse.WAD – Inside Doom's Most Terrifying Mod [video](youtube.com)
4 points by fragsworth 3y ago|0 comments
23.
by fragsworth 3y ago
> furthermore there planning abilities are non-existent. Have you even tried to ask it to plan things out? It can plan things out. In fact, just asking it to plan things out has shown significant benchmark improvements for general questi
24.
by fragsworth 3y ago
The article was clearly written by someone who hasn't used GPT-4 extensively. "Current methods will not achieve AGI unless fundamental algorithmic innovations are introduced that enable AI to ask and answer questions of why."
25.
by fragsworth 3y ago
I won't name three but the one everyone's really afraid of is the theoretical fast/hard "take-off" runaway problem. It is plausible that a smart enough AI given any instruction, without guardrails, will ultimately
26.
by fragsworth 3y ago
I think what's more important is the end part of your prompt, which explains what was previously described and includes a request/question.
27.
by fragsworth 3y ago
You are correct. Additionally, the size of the bank(s) are not really what matters. I want to see the scale (sum) of what was actually lost when they went bankrupt, and how much we (the public) have to put up to keep the system from colla
28.
by fragsworth 3y ago
I feel like your questions are blaming the victim here. The temptation is real and not everyone has the greatest friends. LSD is actually dangerous.
29.
by fragsworth 3y ago
Ok, I agree! That one sentence of mine was wrong. You don't have to reproduce state to continue a conversation. I was just trying to throw a bone, but even that bone was bad. But then... doesn't that just point out that I was righ
30.
by fragsworth 3y ago
> I believe you misunderstood the comment you're replying to. No, did you even read my quote? How did I misunderstand this: > At the end of the chat session, this internal state is not persisted It's misinformed at best, mis

More ›