fragilerock

5 ms·

1.
by fragilerock 4mo ago
By most accounts he's the most cited academic of all time. I'm sure he's less relevant in pure philosophy than other humanities but he is definitely taken very seriously by many.
2.
by fragilerock 1y ago
You read "Users are younger, increasingly female, global, and adoption is growing fastest in lower-income countries" and gathered that "Young moms with no money in poor countries use this product the most". Do I really n
3.
by fragilerock 1y ago
My layperson interpretation of this particular error was that the AI model probably came up with the initial recipe response in full, but when the audio of that response was cut off because the user interrupted it, the model wasn't giv
4.
by fragilerock 1y ago
If someone said "The earth is round and anybody who says it isn't doesn't know what they are talking about" would you still challenge their intellectual honesty in this way?
5.
by fragilerock 1y ago
I said was talking about face-to-face (or 'in person' as you put it) communication. You're absolutely right that over long-distance people prefer to communicate by text, but in person people prefer to communicate by speech so
6.
by fragilerock 1y ago
Then how come in face-to-face interactions people generally communicate using speech rather than text? Clearly there's a disadvantage to using text in that situation, and I think it's that it almost always takes longer to express
7.
by fragilerock 1y ago
That's funny, the way I interpreted this sentence is that usage was already high in older, male, and high-income countries so most of the new users are coming from outside these demographics. Which, ironically, is the exact opposite of
8.
by fragilerock 1y ago
the restaurant spends resources (both physical and human) cooking and serving you the meal, likewise for the barber. a better example would be showing up late for a cinema showing so that you deliberately avoid watching the adverts and trai