foysauce

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by foysauce 3mo ago

   I'm seeing most people's arguments here explaining that remote work has given them the opportunity to voluntarily engage in extra curricular social functions. I think to them, they are totally right that remote work leaves them
2. 2.▲
   by foysauce 4mo ago

   Yet here you are engaging with the article. In my mind, the clickbait title has done its job.
3. 3.▲
   by foysauce 8mo ago

   > couldn't be easier Except for the single step workflow: <paste> <enter> like you do on POSIX shells?
4. 4.▲
   by foysauce 3y ago

   I can't speak for everyone, but in the 6 years and 4 companies I've worked for, we have hired only 2 front-end engineers. Full stack is simply what we want a vast majority of the time. So I'm not saying it's impossible t
5. 5.▲
   by foysauce 3y ago

   I don't think I'm alone in that if I'm reading something that is anywhere near a 1-star, I don't finish it. And then go on to not leave a review. This skews my ratings indeed, because not every book I start is between 3-
6. 6.▲
   by foysauce 4y ago

   Have been reading "What's Our Problem?: A Self-Help Book for Societies" by Tim Urban? I've been loving it, and he talks about the importance of 2 counterparties identifying what _is_, before distinguishing what _should b
7. 7.▲
   by foysauce 4y ago

   This is an era where "what you listen to" is entirely a personal choice, no 2 groups of people hear the exact same set of songs unless they want to. Same goes for movies, TV, any consumed media really.
8. 8.▲
   by foysauce 4y ago

   Interesting that the top 2 comments (when reading this) are at opposite ends of the sentiment spectrum over the name. Personally I think it's one of those names that sucks to use in conversation but great to use on the command line. Of
9. 9.▲
   by foysauce 4y ago

   I believe a very similar use case was the original primary function of Richard's compression algorithm in the show Silicon Valley. Which of course was entirely underutilizing the technology but that was the joke.
10. 10.▲
    by foysauce 4y ago

    Fwiw, The "To" field in the email is "ExecStaff" so it's not completely inferred.