Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
foxtrottbravo
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
7mo ago
I’m building datenba.ch, a hyper-local “digital village” for a few small communities in rural Germany (Neckartal/Odenwald-ish). Instead of another social network, it’s a bundle of small, practical community tools under one umbrella, co
2.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
8mo ago
AI created this, and it shows - but yes I agree somewhat for a rough prototype or experiment this might be enough
3.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
9mo ago
https://ourrhythm.de/ I'm building ourrhythm.de, a privacy first intimacy tracker spawned from a drunken thought: people buy those erotic advent calendars with 24 toys — do they actually keep up with all 24 rounds? It
4.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
2y ago
Should I throw my money at scammers or invest in a huge bubble read to burst?
5.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
3y ago
While yes, these devices are cool and I use them in a couple of projects (mostly centered around home automation), I think there is no good way to count people that way (other than placing them above ingress and egress points). I think the
6.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
3y ago
But how does it know whether it should print the pretext?
7.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
3y ago
Those articles by both Jake and his wive are so well written and I would love to read them fully but I can't. It's gut wrenching that I am just a CT scan away to being in the same (somewhat comparable) situation. I shouldn't
8.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
3y ago
I am with you - while this might seem excessive there are enough people that have the cash and the threat model to go with it. From what I could find the 2009 Protection version (then called high security) was more around 400k-450k€. A stan
9.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
3y ago
Interesting read on the BMW 7 series Protection vehicle. Here's a tidbit from the field: I've heard, through the grapevine, about a team responsible for the safety of a certain high-profile individual (no names mentioned, of cours
10.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
4y ago
A solution for a major retailer for sportswear where I designed a compact Certificate Authority module for our product that can be used to easily generate TLS Certificate for internal services. The main benefits for the customer is physical
11.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
4y ago
If the user opted in to use the Find-My network, yes. Most of users want a way to find / lock / remotely wipe their 1000$ phone in case it gets lost or stolen.
12.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
4y ago
I am not sure if this is sarcasm or not but in case it is Not: No it's not a solution, Netflix already heavily uses IPv6 and most sane v6 endpoints will not be NATed. Maybe they could use v6 Subnets as an Identifier but this would be w
13.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
4y ago
I really find it hard to pinpoint the exact reason. In the moment the "surprise" is what feels overwhelming. I know it's paradox because on the other hand, that's what the interaction my parents and their friends had wer
14.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
4y ago
That‘s me but evermore so I‘m stuck between a rock and a hard place. As one sibling comment - I too have noticed this: I can remember friends of my parents showing by having a good time completely spontaneously. I liked it very much. On the
15.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
4y ago
First and foremost, congratulations on bringing the project to this stage - I think it's an impressive piece of work. I am in no way qualified to trample on your parade but two things came to my mind that pinch a personal nerve of min
16.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
Yes it still is, or at least may be depending on your threat model. CertPinning and CT will go a long way, but do you know that all your software components (not only your webbrowser) use these effectively? What is about credential snagging
17.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
There may be a plethora of differences but the retry delivery has nothing to do with the client you're sending your mail from. That is definitely in the realm of the server being tasked with delivering your mail. In traditional desktop
18.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
Excuse the maybe ignorant question, but I have no feeling for the prices: is this 1$ Tip on a 3$ beer or more like 1$ tip on a 15$ cocktail?
19.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
As a European - just put it on the bill in the first place. I will happily give 15-20% tips for great service, but that is a additional and is given freely - not what is to be expected.
20.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
I was about to ask whether I'm missing something here. "Zero Click" just means no user interaction is required right?So from my Perspektive this is just another way of saying Remote Code Execution? There really isn't som
21.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
We to this day have a cowbell mounted below the stairs to call everyone when dinner is ready
22.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
DSL line connected to a AVM Fritzbox forwarding to a Unifi Dream Machine Pro with VLANs for home lan, guest wifi, DMZ, IOT jail Unifi 24 port switches as backbone 6 Unifi WiFi APs powered over POE Pihole on 2 virtual machines for redundanc
23.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
The really bad thing is that md5 was considered broken in 2005 by security people like Bruce Schneier. To be fair to them it took till around 2008 for this to become widespread opinion but the signs were on the wall around 2004
24.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
Adding insult to injury is the last Paragraph I actually missed: > If companies like microsoft, facebook, twitter, nintendo or zoom can get hacked, what are our chances as a tiny team to not endup getting attacked ? It's not about t
25.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
Reading this makes me furious, not because they were hacked but because this shitshow of a Website was so damn lazy. (paraphrasing) "We were stupid 15 years ago and have been lazy ever since" is a slap to the face. Maybe they shou
26.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
Let's make it constructive then and talk about something that grinds my gears. Throwing all ports in the direction of a single host has nothing to to with a DMZ. I know consumer router manufacturers like to call it that but it isn'
27.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
You obviously need a separate ISP package for every Switch you own
28.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
In a normal NATed setup your ports are closed from the outside until a client from inside your network Starts sending packets to the outside. The Router will keep track of network package going through to the Internet and store it in a tabl
29.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
This seems like an obvious case of Support-Team knowledge topic: people are having issues with their switch getting on to the Internet, here is a support article describing a one size fits all solutions. But as a network guy I hatte the ass
30.
▲
by
foxtrottbravo
5y ago
Probably because they make it hard enough to leave so that the majority of end-users just swallow the pill
More ›