forserious

25 ms·

1.
by forserious 6y ago
You disagree with the idea that calling for violence one a large scale isn't ok?
2.
by forserious 6y ago
Damn! You're right. Who should we reach out to and ask them to stop saying what they're saying? Maybe you can point me to the leader of the atheists while you're at it.
3.
by forserious 6y ago
And... "While authorities haven’t provided details on the medical emergencies, Greeson’s son said his father died from a heart attack mid-protest. Boyland died after being crushed by the crowd, according to one report, while Philips ha
4.
by forserious 6y ago
Shocked to not hear back on this. /s https://www.thedailybeast.com/benjamin-philips-kevin-greeson... Just in case we need more...
5.
by forserious 6y ago
"The circumstances surrounding Mr. Sicknick's death were not immediately clear, and the Capitol Police said only that he had “passed away due to injuries sustained while on duty.” At some point in the chaos " Capitol Police s
6.
by forserious 6y ago
I applaud your efforts pqhwan. But this is the point I tried to make at the top of this thread. These people are playing a game. They aren't interested in talking about this honestly. Seriously, where is the legitimate debate about the
7.
by forserious 6y ago
Please. You're pretending that your "rational" arguments are anything other than bad faith. It's difficult to take anything you say seriously when you can't admit that the actions this week are not the same as the w
8.
by forserious 6y ago
They don't understand what bad faith is. As if smashing doors and climbing through them while armed guards tell you not to with congress fleeing on the other side is not "directly threatened". The absurdity of these arguments
9.
by forserious 6y ago
I wont fall for this nonsense and I encourage anyone reaching this depth to recognize this as the problem we all have to learn to combat. These people are far to accustom to being rewarded for this rhetoric and double speak. As I said befor
10.
by forserious 6y ago
Please... There is no honest way to suggest that the events of this week are comparable to the events surrounding the protesting of appointments. I will note however, that you're subtly changing the topic when you change your argument
11.
by forserious 6y ago
You clearly don't understand what a bad faith argument is. Every word you say demonstrates it.
12.
by forserious 6y ago
Are you saying that references to other books is the equivalent to an algorithm designed to get more clicks?
13.
by forserious 6y ago
Do you accept that there is a difference between r/dt and your bookshelf? In principal, are they different technologies? Or is all information, regardless of medium equal?
14.
by forserious 6y ago
You're right to call this false equivalence. I think it's a mistake to argue the specifics. The parent comment here is arguing in bad faith.
15.
by forserious 6y ago
This comment is why having this discussion is so difficult. To anyone not invested emotionally in this conversation, it's clear that your point isn't making a valid point. They are not equivalent actions. You're pretending th