formulathree

5 ms·

1.
by formulathree 3y ago
Have you been interviewing recently? The qualitative interviews that test design are actually the ones that are unreasonably challenging now. You have to cater to the interviewers design philosophy. For example I tend not to prefer putting
2.
by formulathree 3y ago
There are so many leetcode problems most people can't fully memorize them all and many people just don't. I actually think interview questions that are more qualitative are worse. I have to freaking guess the "design philosop
3.
by formulathree 3y ago
Charisma is one of those factors that bypass conscious mechanisms. Experienced managers think they aren't screening for charisma but I would say 99 percent of managers who say this actually are, but they just don't know it. It&#x2
4.
by formulathree 3y ago
I've been applying too. I've landed tons of interviews about 40 total. Did them all. All failed but one. It's definitely harder than before. Much harder. I got failed for the most trivial reasons. There were interviews where
5.
by formulathree 3y ago
True. Occasionally the thing builds an entire cathedral out of nowhere and you're just shocked.
6.
by formulathree 3y ago
Leave it to Google to do absolutely nothing with this like they did with LLMs.
7.
by formulathree 3y ago
Buy ultrawide. Then tiling works without screwing over aspect ratio. It's a real estate issue. (5120 x 1440))
8.
by formulathree 3y ago
The author is describing something different. He breaks into day dreaming in the middle of changing clothes. Or in the middle of eating medicine. It's a neurological condition. I find it hard to believe this is learned. Daydreaming whe
9.
by formulathree 3y ago
Human concepts can be placed under mathematical interfaces. Inversion for gender ~male = female Ordinality for human hierarchies: CEO > manager > worker Commutativity for human action: Punch human + kick human = d
10.
by formulathree 3y ago
Python syntax has really good ergonomics around functional programming. I hardly write loops when I use the language now.
11.
by formulathree 3y ago
No, parallelism is useful, concurrency without parallelism is not useful. Go and elixir provide some parallelism but the primary focus for both languages is concurrency.
12.
by formulathree 3y ago
>"It's easy to hate the rich. But do you have the courage to hate the poor?" The majority of the population is not rich and the answer to this question/quotation is self mostly self evident to the same majority of the
13.
by formulathree 3y ago
I'm more thinking in terms of logical primitives for the design of modules and components that can be composed, decomposed and recombined. I'm thinking less about proof based correctness.
14.
by formulathree 3y ago
I actually somewhat agree. I think there's a gradient here between modularity and useability. The more modular something is, the less user friendly it becomes. The problem the GP is talking about here is a modularity problem right? He
15.
by formulathree 3y ago
The language of math itself is functional. In fact "functional programming" is basically programming as if everything was math. Think about it, does math allow for variable mutation inside a mathematical expression? No. Interfaces
16.
by formulathree 3y ago
There's another style of programming that has much of the required interfaces predefined in the language itself. A set of universal interfaces that conceptually work universally for all programming. It's mathematical interfaces. C
17.
by formulathree 3y ago
There is strict reasoning why ternary expressions are, in fact, logically better than a typical if statement. The reasoning is because ternary operations eliminate programming singularities. Example: var x; if (someExpression) {
18.
by formulathree 3y ago
>I completely disagree. communication via appearance starts from an early age. Young girls (less than 7 yrs old) try to look pretty. This is because the behavior is ingrained in biology. But make no mistake behavior ingrained in biology
19.
by formulathree 3y ago
Agreed. This issue you're talking about is the forefront of the political climate in the US today. Do we speak the truth? Or do we speak in terms of empathy so as to not diminish constructive conversation? It hurts my feelings when som
20.
by formulathree 3y ago
What do you guys think of combining IaC with regular code? One language that does it all?
21.
by formulathree 3y ago
Get paid for selling oil for people to burn. Get paid for capturing carbon from burned oil. It's not exactly in conflict with their current business model.
22.
by formulathree 3y ago
Beauty isn't only shaped by evolution. It is shaped by culture as well. Evolution has given leeway to the human interpretation of attraction through imprinting. This leaves a lot of variety among cultures on "what is beautiful&quo
23.
by formulathree 3y ago
>Skinny and bombshell are different. Even a bombshell model that is skinny is curvy and not the kind of neotenous androgynous ideal I referred to. You missed the point and clearly don't understand the significance of the difference.
24.
by formulathree 3y ago
>Why do feminine beauty ideals contrast across not just cultures but socioeconomic class? Thinking just about feminine beauty, can you create a uniform rule about why certain strata and societies have historically prefer a more androgyno
25.
by formulathree 3y ago
>But I think that aesthetic beauty is multi-dimensional and temporal. A fine wine or a brandy; a sublime cheese and not a fresh glass of milk. There is a very specific kind of electric, youthful beauty which is ephemeral and fleeting. Bu
26.
by formulathree 3y ago
The tragedy of the commons ends up making local-ism non viable at any level of legitimate scale. Any of it that does get implemented therefore becomes negligible in effect.
27.
by formulathree 3y ago
The problem is none of your solutions are viable either. Even if they were executed the results are usually negligible. In fact most of your solutions end up making us feel better about ourselves. But this is all illusion. For these huge en
28.
by formulathree 3y ago
To translate more what he means. I think the person you replied to is asking: "Is what we see the result of a form of invisible matter?" Invisible matter aka dark matter is the "theory" he is referring to.
29.
by formulathree 3y ago
>Nonsense.>Python "generates" this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/me/test.py", line 3, in <module> print(x[3]) ~^^^KeyError: 3 So? python generates that but the point was demo
30.
by formulathree 3y ago
>Of course it still is. >The type hints have no runtime semantics whatsoever. I clarified my meaning in another comment. You're right, I meant to SAY modern development involves type checking with python. But not with the interpr

More ›