flux3125

7 ms·

1.
by flux3125 22d ago
> it would be hard for me to give up my Linux setup and all the stuff I love about it, even for such performance...Linux progressed really nicely, while MacOS deteriorated at the same rate, and it's changing the balance and the deci
2.
by flux3125 2mo ago
> If OpenAI had done this, the attack would not have happened But then how would they market their product?
3.
by flux3125 3mo ago
And now he's part of the confusing comment section lol
4.
by flux3125 3mo ago
Max 60 bucks a month. More than that and I'd just move to local qwen 35b or some other cheaper model on openrouter.
5.
by flux3125 3mo ago
This reminds me of Coconut Simulator
6.
by flux3125 3mo ago
Sorry, I forgot to add "on Linux" at the end. Still, that's a nice one!
7.
by flux3125 3mo ago
I'm curious if there's a program that uses a simple detection model for UX components to locate clickable areas. This would allow for global navigation similar to VimiumC
8.
by flux3125 4mo ago
It's called Time Series Forecasting
9.
by flux3125 4mo ago
They'll not only do it, but they'll also wrap it in a huge fat rounded border
10.
by flux3125 4mo ago
> It's also never deleted anything it shouldn't or done anything crazy or unrelated to what I asked Until it does. A simple curl request to a compromised website could inject a malicious prompt into it.
11.
by flux3125 4mo ago
> Don't listen to him That's the idea
12.
by flux3125 4mo ago
You're absolutely right!
13.
by flux3125 4mo ago
At least it doesn't know my age Oh wait
14.
by flux3125 5mo ago
Point 2 is so true, I definitely find myself spending more time reading code vs writing it. LLMs can teach you a lot, but it's never the same as actually sitting down and doing it yourself.
15.
by flux3125 5mo ago
I was (positively) surprised that this didn't involve any AI.
16.
by flux3125 5mo ago
Code quality and IDEs aren't going anywhere, especially in complex enterprise systems. AI has improved a lot, but we're still far from a "forget about code" world.
17.
by flux3125 5mo ago
They are okay for vibe coding throw-away projects without spending your Anthrophic/OAI tokens
18.
by flux3125 5mo ago
You ARE the training data
19.
by flux3125 5mo ago
I stopped using Ollama a couple of months ago. Not out of frustration, but because llama.cpp has improved a lot recently with router mode, hot-swapping, a modern and simple web UI, MCP support and lots of other improvements.
20.
by flux3125 5mo ago
> so llama-swap can load Just in case you haven't seen it yet, llama.cpp now has a router mode that lets you hot-swap models. I've switched over from llama-swap and have been happy with it.
21.
by flux3125 5mo ago
In my experience if you're coding or doing something that requires precision, quantizing the kv cache is definitely not worth it. If you're just chatting or doing less precise things it's 1000% worth it going down to Q8 or so
22.
by flux3125 5mo ago
> but with people throwing money behind it, there’s a plan to extract value from the user base from day one. They'll start injecting ads in your commit messages, forcing you to subscribe to a premium plan.
23.
by flux3125 5mo ago
Finally Claude Code can now control Claude Code
24.
by flux3125 5mo ago
> dunno why you'd need such a silly thing though I'm not sure I follow, what alternative to CUDA on Linux offers similar performance?
25.
by flux3125 5mo ago
I remember someone on HN once saying they treat LLM agents like human coworkers, security-wise, and that stuck with me. You don't give your GH keys, email credentials and ssh keys to a coworker. They have their own accounts with scoped
26.
by flux3125 5mo ago
Interesting. If you look at the sources it cited, there are a few links about "Sacred Songs and Solos" (likely from related/side content on the page), my guess is it didn't read the main article and instead anchored on t
27.
by flux3125 6mo ago
to be fair, llama.cpp has gotten much easier to use lately with llama-server -hf <model name>. That said, the need to compile it yourself is still a pretty big barrier for most people.
28.
by flux3125 6mo ago
That’s not what it means. "-it" just indicates the model is instruction-tuned, i.e. trained to follow prompts and behave like an assistant. It doesn’t imply anything about whether thinking tokens like <think>....</th
29.
by flux3125 6mo ago
You're not doing anything wrong, that's expected
30.
by flux3125 6mo ago
I bet the paper was vibe written too

More ›