fluffernutter

76 ms·

1.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
> The Future is Decentralized tHE fUTURE IS qUANTIZED
2.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
The most exciting discovery in our lifetime. Zero conversations about it on some lame social news platform owned and operated by a bunch of dogmatic capitalists. Clueless to innovation outside their realm of control.
3.
The Physics of Magnetic Monopoles – With Felix Flicker(youtube.com)
2 points by fluffernutter 6y ago|1 comments
4.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
I had an FBI agent tell me they were at capacity for investigating new fraud and that, unless someone was going to die, they couldn't take on new cases. This was 2 years ago.
5.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
It's not an unanswered question. It's a meme that the government figured they could use to make people imagine the trash they leave being mailed to them by the government, which then implies the government knows where they live an
6.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
Isn't it they retell and embellish them to the point they sound believable, like GPT-3?
7.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
There is no such thing as cancel culture, just like there is no such thing as the Q behind Qanon. The reason why is because these concepts are memes held in the collective consciousness of humans (and now AI because we trained them on our c
8.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
Maybe you like things simple.
9.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
That question is a setup. A leading question. A question with intent. This is why you ask it, so you can reply the way you do when you answer it for us. Who cares if any of those companies can operate in China freely? It's really their
10.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
Patents are really the stupidest things ever. The idea that something or an idea can be limited to a particular chain of causality is irrational. The only reason someone likes the idea of saying only one chain of causality should exist for
11.
Magnecrystallic Action Shown in Material, as Discovered by Faraday(phys.org)
1 points by fluffernutter 6y ago|0 comments
12.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
I think, given the damage Facebook has done to our civilization, that nothing that guy does is worth discussing, other than how to undo what he has done. I really don't care what book he thinks is good, or not. He's a bad source o
13.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
> But no other instance is obligated to listen to you. So deleting DNS solves this for the Internet?
14.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
Confirmed not working on Firefox. It's 2020, just for the record.
15.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
> A) What percentage of the company are you getting? Usually you are getting something minuscule initially, well below any founder or board member's share. The logic is that, if there is going to be money made, the company will need
16.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
Ah, so it's just a story you are telling yourself and us. That makes a lot more sense!
17.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
I suppose if people keep repeating this, then it might be a thing with a given group of people who keep repeating it to each other. In that case, good luck hiring people like me or that other person here who clearly thinks it's wrong t
18.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
The issue is not whether you should accept a situation which appears to be mutually beneficial to you and the entity soliciting the review. Corporations are typically going to make decisions about the things they do based on income to to co
19.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
REST is an architectural style and while the decision to use the style may lead to "lock in", it in and of itself does not given it's a choice to use it or not.
20.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
I remember that book and it had immersive feedback gloves that controlled the dragonfly.
21.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
> but the parts that are unique to our specific solution Search terms tweaked for your unique interests, and not a commercial entity's, for example.
22.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
I posted about microtubuals here many years ago and people lost their minds. Now, here it is again in an article where an AI wrote it and I can't tell what is real and what isn't anymore.
23.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
This will become useful for my move away from the Bay.
24.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
Maybe people should stop listening to corporations and start doing their own things.
25.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
Same here. It's constantly hoping I'll watch videos I've already watched and its forgotten I've watched.
26.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
It is a fallacy to believe that public information about a non corporal entity would help establish fairness. All corporations operate under the act of blame and judgement to increase profits, or they simply cease to be.
27.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
It is probably true nobody who currently codes against Twitter APIs wants new APIs. I've rewritten them before and won't be doing it again. Maybe someone new will come along to replace us. Twitter doesn't care unless it make
28.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
Why should anyone continue to use Twitter if it is unable to guarantee someone won't hijack one or more of its accounts? Let's face it, those aren't our accounts or our data. They are Twitter's. All of that is controlled
29.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
> This isn't a Facebook problem This is most certainly a problem Facebook created, however. Blaming the public for "not knowing how to use nukes better" while still building and cramming nukes in their inboxes is just ridi
30.
by fluffernutter 6y ago
> The author of this article is some former pentagon and possibly a military spook This is literally a strawman argument. > this kind of data investigation needs someone with a good data science background. Otherwise all we're do

More ›