flowofcontrol

6 ms·

1.
by flowofcontrol 1mo ago
my car keeps hitting the donkey when switching lanes even though I'm already well past it..
2.
by flowofcontrol 2mo ago
Author here. I built Maverik because I want to be able to 1) assess + quantify improvements in agents 2) predict what an agent that would be exposed in a business setting (ie. a single agent for a specific task in a UI) is estimated to cost
3.
Show HN: Maverik – Benchmark, compare and cost-predict your MCP agents(github.com)
2 points by flowofcontrol 2mo ago|1 comments
4.
by flowofcontrol 2mo ago
Awesome work! Can't wait for it to land. What license will you release under?
5.
Agents explained, what makes an LLM an agent?(raw.githubusercontent.com)
1 points by flowofcontrol 2mo ago|0 comments
6.
by flowofcontrol 2mo ago
Thanks, Ill watch the youtube video. I guess I'm trying to define the agent itself to be wider than just the chat loop. The reason is that, when we test agents (not in production yet), the results are extremely varied depending on the
7.
What is an 'agent'? A class/instance definition, updated with the 2026-07-28 spe(raw.githubusercontent.com)
3 points by flowofcontrol 2mo ago|3 comments
8.
by flowofcontrol 2mo ago
You are right, in my mind the 2026-07-28 version was MCP 2.0 but the article never mentions that. I do remember having read about MCP 2.0 elsewhere. Regardless, we cannot expect this to be the last impactful change and to me it makes sense
9.
by flowofcontrol 2mo ago
The improvements look great. At the same time I wonder if it is possible to keep using MCP 1.x as well for now. Development is expensive, right? It also looks possible to transition to MCP 2.x by tackling the different improvements one at a