fjfuvucucuc

6 ms·

1.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
If you're not failing you're not trying hard enough. Personally I don't associate it with the negative connotations you do. I associate it with the word trying.
2.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Yea, don't debate that. I just personally have no tolerance for the behaviour of these framework developers and the level of work they impose on their users. For a business that has engineers to manage this day to day it's less of
3.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
So like PHP? This thread is so cope.
4.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Oh please, I professionally use both daily (enjoy them both), but even I can see JSX is just PHP with extra steps.
5.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
I started out as a symfony snob. Got sick of writing java in PHP so I picked up laravel. Got sick of having to modify my code every time Taylor huffed some new shit so I started building things using WordPress. It's so refreshing knowi
6.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Of course, the issue is they don't have an ai industry. The idea that they do is a CCP talking point theyve been pushing lately. They're pumping out fake ai crap all over the internet.
7.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Fun? Takes like two weekends to build the whitepaper version of google.
8.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
I dunno, it was your idea. Seems like a waste of time to me.
9.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
"I see from your resume that you're more of a maintenance programmer, but we really need people who can hit the ground running, banging out new huge kernel modules. Maybe you could assist them, by writing unit tests, and fetching
10.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Some people slept that way in pre industrial society. Doesn't mean everyone did.
11.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Myth.
12.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
And age. I used to do this fine in my 20s. 30s not so much.
13.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Y'all be joking about this but they yanked my baby out with a damn suction cup stuck to his head. Guy looks like he the baby on Coneheads.
14.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Ok, and when google starts deploying Gmail to old t440s running fedora I'll tell them the reliability "just as good as debian".
15.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Yes. The manager has failed you. Doesn't mean you should put your ass on the line to fix things for the business. That's why these kind of incentive structures are dangerous and why things like OKRs put such heavy emphasis on regu
16.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
I think if you're finding debian too slow you're probably not valuing stability to the same level. That's not a problem with debian, that's just a mismatch in needs, you're probably better off with a "less&quot
17.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
I've had arch running for a solid 7 years the only instability I've had to deal with is when a kernel update broke Bluetooth on my desktop. What instability did you face?
18.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Or you know, you lot could stop giving them money.
19.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Cache is for user specific, non essential data. I'd prefer a multigigabyte download went in state or data dirs if you don't want to lose it regularly.
20.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
It's just ads because YouTube serves you think most clickbaity thing that will keep your eyeballs on screen (for the ads). Homepage doesn't care about discovery at all that's just a side effect. I think maybe you should stop
21.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
All these are nice features but until I see suse wiki pages in google search results along side the ones I see from arch, it's just easier to stay on arch. > Open Build System and OpenQA, for automated building and testing of packag
22.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Isn't that just gpl2?
23.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
You guys use the home screen? It's just ads. Watch the subscription feed.
24.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Xdg isnt just config. Using .config (xdg config) on Mac is super weird. Xdg is also, .cache (xdg cache dir) for data that can be cleared on reboot allowing you to use tempfs for it (of course you can't because a bunch of shit uses it a
25.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Yup, and that reproducing it is a copyright violation. Still a copyright abolitionist though. Maybe now more people will join the fight?
26.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Yes, it defines the structural bounds your CSS is able to manipulate. It doesn't dictate how it needs to be manipulated other than a rough idea about what things will render out in what order. (I'd hardly call that presentation) T
27.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
I never suggested decoupling html and CSS, that is always going to be coupled through selectors. What I suggested was decoupling presentation (actual CSS rules) from structure, the blocks of html. What I'm discussing here is if CSS rul
28.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
Because they're not both style info? Html is a markup language, it applies semantic structure to your content, CSS styles html. Classes are a tool for selecting markup to style. Sure, you can create a class for every single CSS rule yo
29.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
"trivial"? So I still have to componentize my presentation layers to do tailwind "correctly", but instead of writing CSS in readable multiline chunks in a language every developer already knows, I need to use this crypti
30.
by fjfuvucucuc 3y ago
What's up with the colocation argument? Colocation of markup and business logic makes a lot of sense. Colocation of presentation? Why do you even need that? Presentation is abstracted into CSS by design. Having presentation decoupled a

More ›