Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fireflash38
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
1.
▲
by
fireflash38
10d ago
Why is it necessary to legislate it if it's nonsense? If there is no culpability, why would there be any threat?
2.
▲
by
fireflash38
10d ago
It's astoundingly trivial to abuse. If people could imagine it being used against them, maybe they might understand. Like labeling the Republican party a terrorist organization because they sponsored Jan 6 insurrectionists.
3.
▲
by
fireflash38
12d ago
> If you use git for packages, then your repo becomes the package boundary. You no longer have the option of producing multiple packages from one repo, or even one package from multiple repos. What does this even mean? I'd argue tha
4.
▲
by
fireflash38
12d ago
It makes it more accepted, because if everyone is doing it why wouldn't I do it?
5.
▲
by
fireflash38
17d ago
Report that shit to your security officer
6.
▲
by
fireflash38
17d ago
Their dining tables are pretty much all solid pine.
7.
▲
by
fireflash38
18d ago
I think having my career be started in testing has broken my brain. Having seen so many different failure scenarios, it makes actual development difficult. Failure handling in particular is exceptionally difficult, especially when you'
8.
▲
by
fireflash38
29d ago
People are lazy. If you give people an easy way to "fill that void" they will do so, even if it's detrimental to their long term health. No social media? People will still find ways to socialize. It might not be as easy, but
9.
▲
by
fireflash38
1mo ago
I think it's hilarious how AI took something personal and the very first thing it spews out is a classic AI-ism. Do you read over what the AI spits out? Do you read over what you write? It takes time to do either, and both are the thin
10.
▲
by
fireflash38
1mo ago
I think reading and writing test code is harder than the underlying code itself. You must know both the desired behavior of the code-under-test and whether the test correctly stresses that behavior. And then if you're working on anythi
11.
▲
by
fireflash38
1mo ago
Stale closing bugs is the worst. Just because someone moved on from your broke ass product doesn't mean the bug was fixed. I can't count how many times I'll find an old bug still there years later closed with 5+ duplicate i
12.
▲
by
fireflash38
1mo ago
I think it can be pretty hard. It can be hard to find the right fit/abstractions. LLMs don't fix that though. I see some truly awful code come out of them. And no, it's not just better context or use more skillz.md.
13.
▲
by
fireflash38
1mo ago
It's not about kids imo. They're purposely designing things to be as addicting as possible. To me, that is morally wrong, akin to what gambling and "prediction" markets do. Beyond morals, I think it creates deep problems
14.
▲
by
fireflash38
1mo ago
I find it a rather offensive that the suburbs don't have walking/bike path cut-throughs. They're cheap. They can cut down on non-car travel by a ton. They're just damn nice .
15.
▲
by
fireflash38
1mo ago
XP and 7 were only good because it was based off of 2000/NT.
16.
▲
by
fireflash38
2mo ago
A lot of rural areas you really just gotta discount the ratings, both on Google maps and yelp.
17.
▲
by
fireflash38
2mo ago
Why not? Ive been doing it for years, when I worked in office. Get someone to go with you. Or walk to get food/coffee/whatever.
18.
▲
by
fireflash38
2mo ago
It's written by AI
19.
▲
by
fireflash38
2mo ago
Does it matter? When has capitalism cared about fair or free
20.
▲
by
fireflash38
2mo ago
I think you'll find as soon as you codify something strict, people will do their absolute best to work around those rules in any way possible.
21.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
The onus is on you to prove the claim that AI is equivalent or better. But if you're not a troll, from the very fucking start of it there was a boom of products. Like it's practically the definition of it. Are you seriously thinki
22.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
Where is the glut of food and consumer products from AI?
23.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
Do you think that happened bloodlessly with everyone very happy about it? The industrial revolution came along with massive production of goods that people need and desire. Even then, there was still a huge amount of pushback (it still echo
24.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
It's insane to me that this isn't the default view. How are you supposed to follow the law if you don't know what it is? Putting a price on it just makes it is basically criminalizing being poor. Which is what we arguably hav
25.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
I think there are clear benefits to having neighbors and your general community not lead poisoned. So yeah, I think that cost should be split among the entire municipality. I find it interesting that you have such a libertarian viewpoint on
26.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
Hey guys, we don't have ebola or malaria ok, shut up and go back to work.
27.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
> work which burns through money repeating things we already know (racism is bad! poor people are sicker!) and accomplishing exactly nothing Why do we need to study the sun? We already know it goes around the Earth. Flippant, but the poi
28.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
Are the new jobs in the room now? Or perhaps they're somewhere in West Virginia.
29.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
I feel like AI fails the XY problem constantly. And it's one thing that I know people hated so much on Stack overflow.
30.
▲
by
fireflash38
3mo ago
Why not when it's so trivial?
More ›