fguerraz

6 ms·

1.
by fguerraz 4d ago
In the end, it’s the same answer as to why humans do it: incentives. Why do we commit financial fraud and destroy the planet? Because there is only one goal that counts: making more money. It’s the only measure of success for powerful peopl
2.
by fguerraz 10d ago
The previous design was piss-poor
3.
by fguerraz 11d ago
If it’s being exploited “in the wild”, it means someone has already found how to chain it, otherwise what would be the point?
4.
by fguerraz 20d ago
I'm sure there are people in this category, but there's also the other category who just want their stuff to work, and now can as AI to do it, without having to follow stupid processes (try contributing to QT...) or arguing for mo
5.
by fguerraz 20d ago
These maintainer who’ve held the sacred fire for years…
6.
by fguerraz 2mo ago
I mean, they're from Scotland, the watch would have to be pretty water resistant to survive more than one day...
7.
by fguerraz 2mo ago
The strong language is fully appropriate given the circumstances.
8.
by fguerraz 3mo ago
In 2006, in my first job after uni in France, I wrote a toy PaaS system called CASIMIR based on qemu. It was a lot of fun, I could via a web UI launch VMs, access them via VNC, etc.. I've always had a lot of admiration for Fabrice Bell
9.
by fguerraz 3mo ago
Moving to a closed development model => opensource is just a gimmick, especially with a BSD licence.
10.
by fguerraz 3mo ago
I feel like the project just died.
11.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
It’s a good thing because it’s definitely an interesting company worth investing into long term. But not at this valuation. 10% seems reasonable given the profits perspective.
12.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
This is misleading and not the point of the wealth tax. If you’re lucky enough that you don’t need to work for your income, you should be taxed. A lot. How much? Enough to make sure you don’t become so rich that your children don’t need to
13.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
This is great news, maybe people are going to start caring about their electronic gadgets more and not treat them as disposable? Maybe longevity is going to become a criteria again?
14.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
And then Apple pay and Google pay are not going to implement it, and nobody is going to use it.
15.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
This is incredibly light in details, no verifiable claim as far as I can tell. (I’m sure they’re not lying, but we’re not learning anything here)
16.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
Does it mean I can finally run Slack on Asahi?
17.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
They evolve and they don’t. People call things whatever they want. How is it going for X/Twitter?
18.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
I have renamed the bird Türkiye . It was called Turkey in reference to the country, I think it’s fair to rename the bird too.
19.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
Well, let's say I just don't understand the popularity of this magazine on HN.
20.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
So, nothing new? The cosmic ray hypothesis has been dominant for a few years now. This magazine…
21.
by fguerraz 4mo ago
That’s… great. But who runs containerised 32 bit applications?
22.
by fguerraz 5mo ago
I just contributed this [1] which does what you want for seccomp. Well, not by default, but profiling is now effective against this attack. Oh, an this [2] just happened [1] https://github.com/containers/oci-seccomp-bpf
23.
by fguerraz 5mo ago
However, the author managed to squeeze the word "however" eleven times in this article, however.
24.
by fguerraz 5mo ago
In cryptography, you want operations to run in constant time, even if it’s wasteful, otherwise an attacker could guess information about the key or plaintext by measuring execution times. Modern compilers are extremely clever and will produ
25.
by fguerraz 5mo ago
Cryptography and video codecs are notable exceptions, they put a lot of effort to making the code provably memory safe: no recursion, limited use of stack variables, no dynamic allocations, etc. As a result, memory safe languages bring noth
26.
by fguerraz 5mo ago
Distributions using outdated (sorry “stable”) kernels are stupid. We are not 20 years ago, the world in which it made sense doesn’t exist anymore, but the industry is slow to move on. Just pick a long term release and update it regularly.
27.
by fguerraz 5mo ago
Like this: https://archive.is/2026.03.03-070033/https://www.nytimes.com...
28.
by fguerraz 5mo ago
You’re correct, the article doesn’t say anything about that, I’m using my own judgement given the facts that I have. All I know is, if I was at war with the USA, I would definitely cut the internet in my country. Not doing it is like being
29.
by fguerraz 5mo ago
There is no naivety on my part, the USA has publicly admitted that it orchestrated and even armed the protests [1] [1]: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/6/has-trump-confirmed-...
30.
by fguerraz 5mo ago
Excepts the internet blackout has nothing to do with censorship at all. This is just Iran protecting itself from cyber attacks, if they had kept Internet running, they would have been completely pwned.

More ›