fergu

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by fergu 10y ago

   to put it in other words, I'd readily assume a currency couldn't be stable if it wasn't serving its intended purpose, being representative of economic state.
2. 2.▲
   by fergu 10y ago

   > things you buy became too expensive or too cheap. > if the currency remains stable > you could still buy the same amount of most things in other countries not affected by the war Sure I can, sure, but whether or not the currency
3. 3.▲
   by fergu 10y ago

   We rather say the economy is stable, then. If most things go awry after a war, that's not because of the currency and nobody will care about the currency either ... except for traders crossing borders and exchanging currency. In the wo
4. 4.▲
   by fergu 10y ago

   No, it isn't.