Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
felipec
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
1.
▲
by
felipec
10mo ago
DHH didn't refer to foreign-born because that's not what he was talking about. I made it very clear in the article that this is a perfectly valid definition of "native": "living or growing naturally in a particular
2.
▲
by
felipec
1y ago
That's not what you claimed. You not only claimed he said there are many non-white people, you claimed DHH *literally* said that's bad.
3.
▲
by
felipec
1y ago
You are assuming an implication that isn't there. He never said "I want fewer non-white people". Every rational person knows what happens to a city when there's a massive influx of immigrants. So we all know what he is t
4.
▲
by
felipec
1y ago
> He's literally saying that britain is now bad because there's too many non-white people living there. No, he didn't. That's something you are hallucinating he said.
5.
▲
by
felipec
1y ago
[flagged]
6.
▲
by
felipec
1y ago
That's what wokeness does to open source projects. I was banned from the RubyGems project by simply saying "no satisfactory resolution from the development team". Now woke people are walking away from RubyGems because Ruby Ce
7.
▲
by
felipec
1y ago
There's nothing racist there.
8.
▲
by
felipec
1y ago
Wrong. You don't need a CoC to do moderation. All CoC's are ever used for is to silence people the moderators don't like.
9.
▲
by
felipec
1y ago
Autoritarian organizations never explain their reasons.
10.
▲
by
felipec
1y ago
Wrong. The fork was planned since a long time ago.
11.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
There is Rust support and there is a couple of small drivers, that's about it. The decision being disputed is not going to be affected by the shenanigans of Hector Martin, the process is going to be followed as usual. David Airlie summ
12.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
Linus didn't say he was the problem, he said he should consider that maybe he was the problem. That's an invitation to self-reflection. We all should consider that, in every discussion. The opposite is to think that everyone who
13.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
As if he didn't read the comment about not wanting the cross-language code to spread like cancer in the most uncharitable way possible.
14.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
The Nokia N9 used Wayland.
15.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
Both macOS and Windows have more configuration options than GNOME.
16.
▲
The Linux Foundation is wrong about sanctions
(felipec.wordpress.com)
12 points
by
felipec
2y ago
|
1 comments
17.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
Many people are arguing that the Linux Foundation had no choice but remove the Russian maintainers due to USA sanctions. That is not true. They had choices, and here I explain why.
18.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
Since when is it a crime to be wrong?
19.
▲
A body of work of an atypical programmer
(felipec.wordpress.com)
2 points
by
felipec
2y ago
|
0 comments
20.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
I doubt it. Do you have an example of public code using modulo with negative numbers correctly?
21.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
The point of debates it not to convince your interlocutor. Not a single debate in history has ended in the other side changing their position. The point is to convince the audience, and if you think no audience would consider the notion of
22.
▲
Simplifying the Xz Backdoor
(felipec.wordpress.com)
44 points
by
felipec
2y ago
|
0 comments
23.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
The Makefiles CMake generates are not distributed in the tarball. So no, we are not talking about apples to apples.
24.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
No, not all build systems are the same. CMake doesn't rely on generated scripts like autotools does.
25.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
Of course, everything is possible. But the design of autotools and the obfuscation of m4 scripts made it much more easy to sneak in.
26.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
* I do not argue that all experts use !pointer, but most of them do, and if you understand the machine code that will be generated, it's for a good reason. * I did not say the variable being static was "superior", I said they
27.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
Yes, it's simple and obvious and yet most Rust advocates do not get it. They use the performance of all C code as proof that even experts can't write safe C code. Sometimes the obvious needs to be stated.
28.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
It's for the lack of a better word. I have been in projects where I contribute for many many years, and I don't even have commit access. Forget about making the release tarball, the only times I do that is when I'm the main&#
29.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
Me too. But it's not going to happen.
30.
▲
by
felipec
2y ago
That's because if I don't have any problems with a project that has rational leadership there's no point in me writing a blog post shining a light into something that doesn't exist, is there? Have you heard of survivorsh
More ›