fela

11 ms·

1.
Show HN: Livestream of a coding agent controlled by public chat(vibecodedbyx.com)
4 points by fela 10mo ago|0 comments
2.
Startup Roundup #3(thezvi.substack.com)
1 points by fela 1y ago|0 comments
3.
OpenAI: The Battle of the Board(thezvi.substack.com)
28 points by fela 3y ago|4 comments
4.
Show HN: Automatic Data Scientist Using GPT4(github.com)
1 points by fela 3y ago|0 comments
5.
Sydney's Secret: A Short Story by Bing Chat(lesswrong.com)
3 points by fela 4y ago|0 comments
6.
A Short Story by Bing Chat(gist.github.com)
1 points by fela 4y ago|0 comments
7.
by fela 7y ago
I think the best term would have been statistically surprising, because it strongly hint at the fact that the result would be surprising under the null hypothesis, witch really is all that "statistically significant" really means.
8.
by fela 7y ago
I don't think this is true unless you have a ridiculously high electricity bill. When I checked, one intercontinental retour flight was roughly equivalent to my yearly electricity bill, in terms of CO2 emissions. I have to admit I&#x27
9.
by fela 8y ago
I assume you meant: If an airplane is as safe as average then it has PUT_NUMBER chance of having 2 incidents after 150k flights. 0.01% is actually the number I'm getting, assuming parent estimates are correct and making naive assumptio
10.
by fela 8y ago
I like to split the theorem in the following way: P(Hypothesis|Data) = P(Hypothesis) * evidence_factor P(Hypothesis) is the prior probability of the Hypothesis being true, in other words the probability we gave to the Hypothesis before seei
11.
by fela 8y ago
Don't you need time to even define movement? Movement is a change of the position with respect to time. So without time you can't have movement. But obviously you are right that the two concepts are strictly related, that doesn&#x
12.
Train AI in 2018 - Andrej Karpathy (Tesla)(vimeo.com)
3 points by fela 8y ago|0 comments
13.
Landing.ai(landing.ai)
5 points by fela 9y ago|0 comments
14.
Neural Information Processing Systems Videos(facebook.com)
13 points by fela 9y ago|1 comments
15.
Berlin Airlift(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by fela 9y ago|0 comments
16.
by fela 9y ago
But that is very interesting, that means that when saying the numbers they were basically using something similar to Arabic numbers!
17.
NIPS 2017: Non-Targeted Adversarial Attack(kaggle.com)
2 points by fela 9y ago|0 comments
18.
Google NHS deal rebuked again by DeepMind panel(bbc.com)
2 points by fela 9y ago|0 comments
19.
Keybase chat: iPhone and Android betas(keybase.io)
1 points by fela 9y ago|0 comments
20.
by fela 9y ago
The current stock price (and thus market cap) already assumes future growth. The market cap would increase further only if growth exceeds the current expectations of investors. (Or due to other factors unrelated to growth).
21.
by fela 9y ago
I stopped using bookmarks after I realized I wasn't using them, thanks to a combination of: 1. Autocompletion: for any website I use regularly I just write a substring of the url or Title (Firefox does this especially well). This cover
22.
20 Tesla P100Ds with Slicks and Wings? Meet Electric GT(arstechnica.com)
1 points by fela 10y ago|1 comments
23.
by fela 10y ago
Looks a bit like an over engineered coffee machine to me. On the other, if customers enjoy the experience, why not.
24.
Electric Carmaker Faraday Future on the Brink of Collapse(jalopnik.com)
2 points by fela 10y ago|0 comments
25.
Amazon begins Prime Air drone delivery trial in the UK(arstechnica.co.uk)
3 points by fela 10y ago|0 comments
26.
by fela 10y ago
The definition of p-value is the same independent of method, as far as I can tell the only real difference is that by Neyman–Pearson you just look at whether the p-value is below a threshold, and Fisher looks at p-value as "strength of
27.
by fela 10y ago
"it’s telling you that there’s at most an alpha chance that the difference arose from random chance. In 95 out of 100 parallel universes, your paper found a difference that actually exists. I’d take that bet." This is wrong. It’s
28.
by fela 10y ago
"what are the odds that the results you observed could have arisen by chance?" If you say it like this it will very easily be misinterpreted. Once your results are in there are two cases: (1) either the null hypothesis is true and
29.
by fela 10y ago
Unfortunately no. Very much no, even though it's widely believed that that is a good definition/intuition (and used in many places). It's the odds of having that results due to chance, if the null hypothesis is true [0]. Tha
30.
Tesla Self-Driving Demonstration(tesla.com)
1 points by fela 10y ago|0 comments

More ›