fearless1ron

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by fearless1ron 5mo ago

   Not sure what kind of reply you're expecting here. I'm defintely not cheering you on for abusing users to make you $200/month. Your business model is cancer and the reason why the Internet is the kind of shithole it is today.
2. 2.▲
   by fearless1ron 5mo ago

   Why did you think that using an ad network was ever a sensible option for revenue? Ads are cancer and a security risk, so blocking them is just common sense.
3. 3.▲
   by fearless1ron 5mo ago

   Unfortunately not. Adblocking is a security requirement and should be enforced by any enterprise.
4. 4.▲
   by fearless1ron 5mo ago

   All ad networks are cancer, in my humble opinion. Adblocking is a security requirement, so I have no compassion for anybody who bases their economic success on any ad network.
5. 5.▲
   by fearless1ron 1y ago

   This still means that Google is effectively gatekeeping what can be installed on the hardware you own and what cannot.
6. 6.▲
   by fearless1ron 1y ago

   Well, obviously changing "installing software" to "sideloading" worked somehow.
7. 7.▲
   by fearless1ron 1y ago

   Host it in a country with free speech then
8. 8.▲
   by fearless1ron 1y ago

   I agree with you, but can we stop calling installing software on the hardware you own "sideloading"?