fdsafsd34

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by fdsafsd34 4y ago

   Mmm, not really unpredictable, it is easy for thought exercises to avoid the dirty real world, but in the real world, Large Language Models have recently proven that many quite difficult abstract probability exercises, when taken to the rea
2. 2.▲
   by fdsafsd34 4y ago

   I think the actual assumption is that we are currently seeing just one direction of the arrow of time, but if there is no arrow of time, maybe we are already seeing the future and not realizing it is the future. I commented further in this
3. 3.▲
   by fdsafsd34 4y ago

   Just commented about interpreting the Probability Law as sort of "Inverted 2nd. Law of Thermodynamics". I'll expand here how if the arrow of time actually doesn't exist, the future could change the past without breaking
4. 4.▲
   by fdsafsd34 4y ago

   "Sounds more like metaphysics?" The regular arrow of time from the human perspective, "leaks" changes into the future. The future is constantly being changed by the past. You can measure those changes by many ways, the 2