fbbbbb

5 ms·

1.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
They landed it!!
2.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
It doesn't qualify because you said so, really? This is something else than a joke, because? Speculation and assertion is not an argument. If a statement is a joke is not defined whether someone finds it is funny or not, but by its int
3.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
So what do you do when an index into an array is out of bounds at run-time. You can't perform a check every time because that would go against the C's principle, and at the same time it would degrade performance, making it less us
4.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
>reproduce the MIT license alongside your GPLv3 license The MIT license must be included in the provided software, but it isn't a part of the new license.
5.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
One intelligent mind in the combine that is BuzzFeed, doesn't account for the horde of mindless drones who write a huge majority of click-bait material. I don't see where do you see the support for the idea that their goal is qual
6.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
How does that relate to self driving cars?
7.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
I agree, minus the ride-sharing part, which will have a very minor share, in numbers compared to taxis and similar. Car is still a necessity in the eyes of an average (first world) human and our individuality will not let us share them.
8.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
Articles with lists, are like a self contained series of short clickbait articles.
9.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
The request was invalid from the start and OP probably knows it. FOIA is not used to obtain information contained in the seized material, but information that arose during the investigation. If for some reason, the information created in
10.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
Will be slightly scratched. He used it as a beer coaster. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upxrrHQ6sXY
11.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
Can you share the link and the title of the video? I want to find a mirror.
12.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
Too crazy. I can't believe any public person, would say anything like that on record. I wouldn't be surprised if the article was revealed to be fake, but apparently he approved it [0]. So, either the article is real, or this [1] t
13.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
The next to last paragraph makes a good point. Currently the state of the game seems to be: we don't care about you, as long as you aren't one of the most immoral actors.
14.
Weird Number Bases(datagenetics.com)
6 points by fbbbbb 11y ago|0 comments
15.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
Let's admit it, we just want to see the pictures and compare them to ourselves.
16.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
I incorrectly assumed the word coder denotes a male programmer. The bias is very strong and real. Anyway, judging from the website, I would say there are only males.
17.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
I was mildly surprised when John Carmack retweeted the original tweet. https://twitter.com/smashingmag/status/675624576630571009 The state of the image (jpeg artifacts), was a dead giveaway that the comparison is
18.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
Yes, the article is essentially quote mining the movies.
19.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
It is becoming more and more current and relevant. I'm assuming you saw the current 19th season. If you didn't see it, or at least the last three episodes that form a "trilogy" or sorts, and talk about online ads and ad-
20.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
I think they mostly see the ads (read: products) as things that will influence their life positively. While this is true in the short term, brief entertainment in compensation for their money, it makes the life less significant in the long
21.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
Star Citizen employs microtransaction, you just pay them in advance. There are also whales, like the guy who paid 30000$, and many more who pay between 100$ and 1000$. In comparison with other mentions it is even worse, because this game is
22.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
You base your argument on authority. If an actual health professional sells homeopathic remedies, then according to your argument, they are allowed to. A product should be legal, if it really does what is it advertised to do. How is this va
23.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
And why not? There are cases over the world where advertising was banned with success. http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5338 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/112
24.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
Try setting it to an imaginary value.
25.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
I would say that someone died within 1000 feet from where you live, while you actually lived there. This is probably true, unless you live in a remote house. And they all forget to count ghosts from microorganisms and insects.
26.
Threat Spotlight: CryptoWall 4 – The Evolution Continues(blog.talosintel.com)
2 points by fbbbbb 11y ago|0 comments
27.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
That is an appeal to tradition, and it a fallacy. It isn't moral for advertisers to do harmful things to users just because most advertisers do it. Most scientist do not do harmful things to their subjects. Modern science requires cons
28.
by fbbbbb 11y ago
merely expos ing your own feelings. (Is that what you meant?) Yes, in that case it is. Facebook is forcing us to stare in a mirror of our own mistakes and failings. We should fix them and not avoid them. Unfortunately the mirror is crook