fatbrowndog

5 ms·

1.
by fatbrowndog 4mo ago
AI promotional products are similar becoming similar to leak-production products. What do you think? https://imgur.com/a/rRXpppK
2.
AI marketing promotions are similar to female leak-protection products(imgur.com)
2 points by fatbrowndog 4mo ago|3 comments
3.
by fatbrowndog 4mo ago
I'm using the deepseek-v4-pro model is currently offered at a 75% discount. My bad it's 75% discount, via OpenRouter. I use the Claude-Max-20 ($200) plan. I manage to max it out 2 weeks. Planning to move to maybe multiple accounts
4.
by fatbrowndog 4mo ago
not good. I use DeepSeek's plan, Kimi AI, OpenRouter and it seemly consumes more tokens, than Claude's. I consume Claude ~30% per day in of, 1 week, Max,x20. Equivalent in Kimi Ai, is I consume 60% in one day, in one week. DeepSee
5.
by fatbrowndog 8mo ago
Vega's paper claims to derive 65+ fundamental quantities from a "198-bit information-geometric architecture" with zero free parameters. However, careful analysis reveals this is sophisticated numerology dressed in geometric l
6.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
Same as previous - r_p = 4·ƛ_p·(1 - α/(4π)) Red flags: Why "4" times the reduced Compton wavelength? The number 4 appears twice (in 4·ƛ and 4π), suggesting it was chosen to make things work out. "Tetrahedral structural l
7.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
so I look at it again... Version v13 10.5281/zenodo.18023121 Dec 22, 2025 12.18.3. Total geometric cost The final value is the static cost S adjusted by the dynamic efficiency C: α–1 = S – C α–1 = (4 · π3 + π2 + π) – (α / 24) α–1
8.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
He's now admitting mz is NOT the physical mass - instead m_φ is. Let me check what m_φ is in his paper... From his paper: m_φ ≈ 4.16×10⁻⁹ kg ≈ 2.5 nanograms (the "resonance mass") My response: The problem isn't mathemati
9.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
btw, I'm not making fun of you. You said you used Gemini. Did you really use it?, I put in your paper and I got a lot of criticisms and pointed out errors.
10.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
The model only uses 1, 2, and √5. Uses √2, not just 1, 2, √5 Uses 4⁶⁴ = 2¹²⁸ (huge power, not "simple") Uses mp (measured value as input) It derives ... alpha (0.005 ppm). CRITICAL ERROR: He's confused about what he's do
11.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
hi, the formula should allow both. you have an integral and order^ power.
12.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
His G Formula (Section 14.6) G = (ℏ·c·2·(1 + α/3)²) / (mp²·4⁶⁴) His result: G ≈ 6.6742439706 × 10⁻¹¹ m³·kg⁻¹·s⁻² CODATA 2022: G = 6.67430(15) × 10⁻¹¹ Δ: 8 ppm Critical Analysis 1. Where Does 4⁶⁴ Come From? He claims it's from
13.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
This paper will not pass peer review at any serious journal because: The mφ prediction contradicts existing data The "unification" adds forces rather than deriving them The g-2 formula is 630× worse than QED
14.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
α⁻¹ = S - 1/(24α) α⁻¹·24α = 24αS - 1 24α²S - 24α - 1 = 0 α = (24 ± √(576 + 96S))/(48S) α = (24 + √(576 + 96·137.036...))/(48·137.036...) α = (24 + √13,723.66...)/(6577.74...) α = (24 + 117.12...)/(6577.74...) α = 14
15.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
α⁻¹ = S - 1/(24α) α⁻¹·24α = 24αS - 1 24α²S - 24α - 1 = 0 α = (24 ± √(576 + 96S))/(48S) α = (24 + √(576 + 96·137.036...))/(48·137.036...) α = (24 + √13,723.66...)/(6577.74...) α = (24 + 117.12...)/(6577.74...) α = 14
16.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
Doesn't fix or predict Fan et al. 2024 latest dataset. Try harder.
17.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
have a suggestion for you. spend 2 years under-grad physics, + 3 years to purse a master in mathematics or physics and do post-doc work. Or maybe change from Gemini to some other more competent LLM.
18.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
his formula: α⁻¹ = (4π³ + π² + π) - (α/24) α⁻¹ = 137.0359996 Experimental (CODATA): 137.0359991 Δ: < 0.005 ppm Critical Problem: This is CIRCULAR The formula is: α⁻¹ = S - (α/24) But α appears on both sides! This is not a close
19.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
Fundamental Physics: Gauge symmetry is ignored Quantum field theory is dismissed as "inefficient" General relativity is "corrected" without understanding why it works Methodology: Fitting post-hoc (choosing w=2, δ=√5 bec
20.
by fatbrowndog 9mo ago
Major Structural Issues 1. The Central Equation is Dimensionally Problematic Fu = (U / r²) · ((m₁ · m₂ / z) + s) Where s = n₁ · n₂ (product of charge numbers). Problem: This adds a dimensionless quantity s to a quantity with dimen
21.
Ask HN: Compiler speed-up or Build Caching tool. Hard to find?
16 points by fatbrowndog 2y ago|22 comments
22.
RapidClipse(rapidclipse.com)
2 points by fatbrowndog 2y ago|0 comments
23.
by fatbrowndog 2y ago
This is an awesome template!
24.
by fatbrowndog 3y ago
On your repo, it is Apache-Licensed. Where's the sources? Will you be releasing source-code version of this?
25.
by fatbrowndog 3y ago
On your repo, it is Apache-Licensed. Where's the sources? Will you be releasing source-code version of this?