fasbiner

6 ms·

1.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
Maybe your cultural frame is that mental health isn't a protected category and it's an appropriate insult. That's not what the law says in professional environments and that's not been my experience in professional disco
2.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
[flagged]
3.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
Presumably you do a lot of back-and-forth with AI, and as many other commenters have pointed out, this seems to have made you more credulous and less informed.
4.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
This point of view runs directly against mutually agreed upon matters of fact: https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2022/03/15/ama-scope-of-p... The US healthcare system is not a market system nor did it occur
5.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
> A two sentence comment requesting one piece of information that is highly likely to be collated with the original information for any reputable source You would describe that as "relentless, harassing, and tangental?" rather
6.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
I'm rooting for you, to be clear! It sounds like your approach is more sophisticated than the average, and this is a pain point that is starting to get a lot of attention.
7.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
I can deeply, deeply relate. X and Bluesky are both going nuts with ai and ai scams, but _both_ of them banned an advertising account because we were... using a bot to automate behavior because their APIs are only a subset of functionality.
8.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
Please, please, please actually do this yourself or read any of the top comments. You are still missing the point, which you will understand if you actually do this and then look at the logs.
9.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
I would spend less time with theory and more time with practice to understand what people are getting at. MCP and CLI could, in theory, be the same. But in practice as it stands today, they are not. > MCP is just a way to write this in a
10.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
Some roosters lay eggs. You might believe there is intrinsic sexual dimorphism among mammals and birds. You might even have overwhelming experimental and scientific evidence that proves it. But ask yourself: is it worth losing your job over
11.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
Sorry, I think of HN as a technical forum where people prize precision. I think that when you informally bolster lies of omission with your own imprecise language agreeing with it, that harms the quality of discussion and creates pointless
12.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
I applaud your consistency and I await your categorical opposition to the United States and Israel. Or is there some nuance and you feel, in order to remain consistent, that it would be permissible in principle for China to bomb Taiwan and
13.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
The majority of US support for Taiwan and it's current situation is owed entirely to supporting a military junta from the mainland that massacred the local Taiwainese who objected to it and suppressed civil society. Are you saying you
14.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
I would also like to know if these are dual citizens or not. I think it would be newsworthy if hundreds of US passport holders who do not have chinese passports also were being held in China and not charged with any crime and unable to acce
15.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
I don't doubt you, but what if someone's else's wife felt differently. Would that counteract your wife? Or is your wife special in an objective sense and her intuitions about hypotheticals are more valid than anyone else&#x2
16.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
What are you talking about? Why are you using imprecise language like "popped the camera open?" You've run into a site you view on chrome/firefox/safari accessing your camera without granting access a few times now?
17.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
You're stringing together a bunch of weasel words that are not a proof or a plausible suggestion of a proof. "Suggests is more ambiguous" and "undermines the framing" are bare assertions you want to be true based
18.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
Very problematic to think that something's reproductive attributes have to correspond to what gendered noun we call it by.
19.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
This is a not-unexpected result if you think of AI as what it actually is instead of what a multi-trillion dollar marketing campaign wants it to be. At heart, the corpus for this going to be an aggregation of commentary from people in the u
20.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
No, nothing cute like that. https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/18079 The instance owner has absolute anonymity and absolute power to snoop with no access logs and no known identity. CCPA? GDPR? Acces
21.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
This looks interesting, but if you don't have creepy and opaque admin controls and algorthimic manipulation that create a thousand little tinpot Larry Ellisons, you should highlight that. Because that's why no one I know uses Mast
22.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
Yeah but it's not. This a complete contrivance and you're just making shit up. The prompt is much shorter than the output and you are concealing that fact. Why? Github repo or it didn't happen. Let's go.
23.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
Part of the secret to the Simpsons' longevity is that is is something the majority of people on earth can catch a few seconds of in the background and still be able to follow by sheer recognition alone. This was always the majority of
24.
by fasbiner 7mo ago
This is an extremely disappointing response. The issue is your dev relations people being shitty and unhelpful and trying to solve actual problems with media-relations speak as if engineers are just going to go away in a few days. Arrog
25.
by fasbiner 8mo ago
Very curious to know where you have been in the last few years for your to regard openai.com/chat as something known only to specialists and wholesalers. To stick with the sausage-making analogy: this is like someone selling costco hot
26.
by fasbiner 8mo ago
I think the point was pretty clear if you are able to consider more than one point of view. People who are highly motivated and for whom it could make a life-or-death difference have considerable technical skills in this area in Russia cons
27.
by fasbiner 8mo ago
What you are saying is empirically false. Change in a single line of executed code (sometimes even a single character!) can be the difference between a secure and non-secure system. This must mean that you have been paid not to understand t
28.
by fasbiner 8mo ago
Nothing changed, but many people struggle to understand their our own degree of relative ignorance and overvalue high-level details that are leaky abstractions which make the consequentially dissimilar look superficially similar.
29.
by fasbiner 8mo ago
The deeper issue is that your product is one of many chatGPT wrappers with no unique hook, not that users can find out you're one of many chatGPT wrappers with no unique hook.
30.
by fasbiner 8mo ago
I really appreciate this comment. So much of marketing is "puffery" or based on what would be best for the app creator for the audience to believe. Sometimes that lines up with reality, sometimes it doesn't. In this case the

More ›