fartsucker69

5 ms·

1.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
the current thinking is no because quantum fields still act within spacetime, which is curved by gravity. there could be no particle that exists outside of this, so every particle has to interact gravitationally. but obviously, this is a co
2.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
well the correct theory will have to explain what we actually observe, which is going to limit the nature of what these theories can be. I'm not sure if you have an example of something that should be accepted when it's currently
3.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
I can accept that in extreme cases people just don't run across the trivia of what a modulo operator does by more or less random coincidence (while learning programming that is. I get that most people in general would have no idea). Bu
4.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
criticism can be positive, neutral or negative.
5.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
when did it start that the storytelling around every piece of physics news was framed as a controversy? I know it's been a while, but I feel like it wasn't this way 20 years ago...
6.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
my match will get tmi
7.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
the sum here is the sum of wins or losses across all players. for you to win, someone else has to lose. in an economy everyone can be a winner.
8.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
in the limit the distinction between something that is learned and something that is programmed genetically is somewhat a matter of definitions. if a species genes makes it so they create a complex social web that teaches all its individua
9.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
simple nets for sure, but spiders can easily deal with an uncountable number of corner cases, I somehow think it's not reducible to all-too simple rules (in the 'game of life' sense) and more an interaction of several non-tri
10.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
no idea where you got the idea for that nonsense. there is a ton of selective pressure after reproduction. there are really an uncountable number of mechanics affecting survival fitness of each individual in a group after reproduction.
11.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
there would be an absolute small, at planck scales (from what we know) there's also an absolute big, known in cosmology, far beyond the scales of galaxies, galaxy clusters, etc... it's your mom
12.
by fartsucker69 2y ago
it is faster in just about every way. less memory, even the cpu instructions (which are usually not the problem) are faster. there's something fucky going on with code gen here. or it could also simply be the measurement procedure that
13.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
what's morally problematic about emulating something you already own?
14.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
the only pay what you use thing is bullshit. because everything you want to use actually costs something. the point being that a better implementation would give you the same things without a cost...
15.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
you're likely not exposing yourself to the root cause of your social anxiety and are only doing practical exposure therapy to symptoms rather than the root causes. here it really depends what the crux is for you personally. just as an
16.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
veach thesis gives me "damn I wish I could read" moments
17.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
that's not true. they only ban ai if you don't clearly have usage rights for the data that the ai was trained on. obviously, this includes basically all of the big and popular available AI APIs at the moment. that sucks for using
18.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
those things are not particularly similar. the tree that nobody can hear while it's falling still has a real and measurable impact on its environment in various ways, something where if if not simulated while nobody was around, the si
19.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
iq 30 take
20.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
iq 30 post nobody asked. people asked about why specifically japan stands out here, it is a big statistical outlier.
21.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
bare bones correlation study
22.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
comments like this really make me smh. what's wrong with some lucky people getting rich off of this? you do realize they financed that research for the past 20 years, and if it's actually an investment group instead of a few passi
23.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
You just have to get an understanding of how an if(...) is different from a compile-time #if and where they end up costing you time or memory: - if(...) has a small runtime cost for literally executing the comparison instruction. very small
24.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
in permutations the ordering of the individual elements is important (a different order of exactly the same elements is a different permutation), but it's irrelevant in uber shaders. they should just say combinations (different element
25.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
all quantities in virtual worlds are always quantized.
26.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
imagine downloading a tv show and it turns out its shit
27.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
Nothing is really necessarily being deprived here. Society could just decide to pay for those expensive engineers and then some, take the purely economic loss, and enjoy relatively clean energy. have fun with that though
28.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
seems like a really bad introduction if you don't already know what a fourier transform is
29.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
no offense to nintendo and fans, but fidelity wise the game looks like an early ps3 game and runs at 30 fps with dips in certain areas and very regular dips when using certain game mechanics. I can count the triangles on a lot of geometry v
30.
by fartsucker69 3y ago
except its not consistent with all the observations, which is why it's not accepted consensus.

More ›