Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
faanghacker
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
1.
▲
by
faanghacker
5mo ago
Agreed. And if more high income professionals pursued this path, it would tip the balance of power in the workforce away from employers. That's a win for all except those at the top.
2.
▲
by
faanghacker
5mo ago
Keep in mind that for me it was before the FAANG companies became the new evil tech overlords, and to some extent even before the Great Financial Crisis of 2008. Back then it was much easier for naive young college students or new grads to
3.
▲
by
faanghacker
5mo ago
High achieving college students.
4.
▲
by
faanghacker
5mo ago
This article has a narrow definition of passive income, limiting it to these low-barrier-to-entry schemes. Other parts of the FIRE world have emphasized being a landlord or flipping houses, for example. I personally made it happen by workin
5.
▲
by
faanghacker
7mo ago
Shouldn't this be great news that the government is banned from using Anthropic? I don't know why suddenly the narrative here turns to spinning this as "Trump is evil" when this is actually keeping the AI company out of
6.
▲
by
faanghacker
2y ago
11
7.
▲
by
faanghacker
3y ago
Great answer, thank you for your perspective.
8.
▲
Ask HN: Why do people care about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity?
29 points
by
faanghacker
3y ago
|
62 comments
9.
▲
by
faanghacker
3y ago
https://www.ksbw.com/article/alix-tichelman-indicted-for-2nd...
10.
▲
by
faanghacker
3y ago
Roof Koreans were in LA not SF.
11.
▲
by
faanghacker
4y ago
Should be "lays off" /grammarnazi
12.
▲
by
faanghacker
4y ago
Han Solo was apparently wrong when he said "droids don't rip people's arms off when they lose."
13.
▲
CEO of $68B investment firm quits to sit on the beach
(markets.businessinsider.com)
2 points
by
faanghacker
4y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
It's Time for Tech Employees to Become More Investment Savvy
(linkedin.com)
2 points
by
faanghacker
4y ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
by
faanghacker
4y ago
Save up money religiously for over a decade and retire early.
16.
▲
by
faanghacker
4y ago
I am a Silicon Valley native, graduated from Stanford, worked at Google for a decade. Never felt like I belonged there socially or in terms of viewpoints. I left to complete the journey to financial independence without the burden of Califo
17.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
That was the whole point -- it was fixed early on by killing the tank, rendering the exploit useless, which is why you never see it in games anymore. Search on YT for the tank glitch.
18.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
> I sometimes get an urge to work on the myriad of game ideas I've written down over the years. And every time I remind myself that what I really like is the "idea" of making a game, not the actual process. Because the act
19.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
Not at all. Network issues make everything in games more complicated, not just bullets going through doors. Everything in games can be complicated: physics, doors, AI, network. Even the first line of that video description. I think that jus
20.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
Except network issues were not mentioned in the video. Moving the goalposts.
21.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
I noticed that most if not all of these questions are applicable to doors in even simple 2D games. Whereas the physics engine and real-world realism aspects are what the video talks about. If the problem is that doors are inherently difficu
22.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
Yes, StarCraft I. The issue wasn't physical realism. The problem was that a player could move a tank under a building during mid-landing, siege it up, and the boundaries of the building protected the siege tank from melee attacks. Kill
23.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
I watched the video again. Still don't see what the big deal is. For example... NPCs blocking doors? Don't put NPCs there, and tell AI to avoid door zones rather than trying to make them know how to move out of the way when doors
24.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
Because the relativity principle applies to non-accelerating motion relative to other objects. A planet orbiting the sun is accelerating toward the sun.
25.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
How should I respond if I tell them it's a warmup that shouldn't take more than 10 minutes, and they're still having trouble? Isn't that going to demoralize them?
26.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
I've gotten some candidates who come from backgrounds with non gregorian calendars. In those cases we spend a minute talking about their calendar and then I ask them to write it for their calendar.
27.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
We don't explore it from every angle. I try to speed them up by saying things like "first 3 months have 31/28/31 days, and use '...' for the remaining days so you don't have to write it out. A few candidat
28.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
They usually figure out the mapping/array of dates per month early.
29.
▲
Ask HN: Is my starter interview question too simple?
6 points
by
faanghacker
5y ago
|
25 comments
30.
▲
by
faanghacker
5y ago
If we're going to highlight the founders' whiteness, can we also highlight their Jewishness?
More ›