fa3556

6 ms·

1.
by fa3556 8mo ago
Xiaomi phones also have it but you can block Wi-Fi only for user (non system) apps. However you can block mobile data access to all apps. None of the Samsungs I have owned so far had this feature and neither did my last Pixel.
2.
by fa3556 9mo ago
Tweaks are divided into essential and advanced. The essential ones shouldn't have any negative impact on the system. They also document the changes each tweak makes (so you can undo them): https://winutil.christitus.com&#x2F
3.
by fa3556 10mo ago
Maybe. The appeal of distros like these is lost on those who know linux well. If you are new to linux, the difference between Aurora/Bazzite/Bluefin and base fedora (silverblue, kinoite) can be like day and night.
4.
by fa3556 10mo ago
I feel like the ship has sailed for X11 or any fork of it, regardless of its technical merits (or the lack thereof). All the major DEs (KDE, Gnome, COSMIC) are either already wayland exclusive or soon will be. New DEs like niri, hyprland, s
5.
by fa3556 11mo ago
You could use the about:config preference browser.profiles.enabled in the meantime I suppose.
6.
by fa3556 11mo ago
No I don't use sync at all. I think it might just require `browser.profiles.enabled` to be set to true in about:config, at least until wider rollout.
7.
by fa3556 11mo ago
You can (now?) create profiles from the account icon in the toolbar [1] and at least on my firefox install, you can also do it from the hamburger menu. I use firefox via flatpak and had no issues so far accessing profile data (in one of th
8.
by fa3556 1y ago
I understood GP's point to be that because Obsidian leaves a lot of functionality to plugins, most people are going to use unverified third party plugins. On arch however most packages are in core or extra so for most people they wont
9.
by fa3556 1y ago
I think this criticism is unfair because most common packages are covered by the core and extra repos which are maintained by Arch Linux. AUR is a collection of user build scripts and using it has a certain skill cliff such that I expect
10.
Gnome 49 Release(release.gnome.org)
11 points by fa3556 1y ago|1 comments
11.
by fa3556 1y ago
I feel like the only other solution to kernel-level anticheat is some kind of measured and verified system image. The whole chain has to be signed and trusted from the TPM through the kernel to userspace. This way if anyone tampers with the