estevaoam

19 ms·

1.
by estevaoam 2y ago
I agree. The main function of a component should describe what it does, similar to describing the algorithm in natural language. I have been following this pattern with success. It is much easier to understand things at a glance.
2.
by estevaoam 3y ago
Not hotdog
3.
by estevaoam 4y ago
https://github.com/DarkFlippers/unleashed-firmware
4.
by estevaoam 4y ago
As if one's market value is always coherent with their skills. There are so many variables that plays a role on how much one earns: where you live, negotiation skills, marketing skills, getting competent people to evaluate you properly
5.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Sorry, I didn’t want to sound too sarcastic and negative: I don’t disagree with you. But looking from a broader timescale it is clear that in general we’re speeding up our technological progress in a logarithmic scale. I have been following
6.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Surely we can say that about our last 10s years of our human existence.
7.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Why most people are blind to the most important point of those models: the progress is moving at astonishing pace. IMO it is a useless discussion to debate about the current SOTA or economics. In two years we will certainly have some breakt
8.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Being honest, I am not that much concerned with what can I do as individual. If sh*t hits the fan we’re going to have to solve this at societal level, not individual. As others already put out there: if society collapses heavily due to disp
9.
by estevaoam 4y ago
I agree. I’m also not happy with that. Hopefully we’re getting more open tools like Stable Diffusion.
10.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Innovation is really a weird thing. If we could show ChatGPT to people 10, 20 years ago I'm certain most people would be amazed by this technology. Today, lots of people heavily criticize its limitations and thinks 40 bucks/mo is
11.
by estevaoam 4y ago
I agree with you. I also think it is useful to understand limits. This is not what I’m arguing against, it is affirming limits without the knowledge to do so. Until we don’t really figure out how our intelligence works we can’t say we can’t
12.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Sorry but your argument doesn’t make sense. Engineering/building is different than understanding how things works. Surely is related: if you build something you usually can learn how things work - and vice-versa. Insane to me is to aff
13.
by estevaoam 4y ago
I find it amusing that so many people is skeptic about general AI, trying to come up with arguments that it will never happen, while at the same time we do not understand how our own intelligence work. Go figure out.
14.
by estevaoam 4y ago
> I do think high frequency rate monitors are a gimmick Do you mean refresh rate? If yes, I used to think that but couldn’t be more wrong. Nowadays I have a 144hz monitor and I’m considering even going >240hz. If you have the gear to
15.
by estevaoam 4y ago
I agree with you. I don’t understand why some people get annoyed about this. Any desired life change starts with goal setting. Easy to say “just do what you’re supposed to do” as if that phrase by itself had magic powers. It is known that m
16.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Interesting, we used Taiga long time ago (5 years?) and honestly it was too simple to what we needed. The UI was poor and the whole application was slow in general. Glad to see they’re still pushing the project forward though, every competi
17.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Lately I arrived to the hypothesis that our minds are nothing else than an illusion. Of course, a very useful one. Why? Because I can draw an analogy to a video game character with some shocking sucess. DISCLAIMER: I just like to overthink
18.
by estevaoam 4y ago
I am sorry to hear that. You might find very useful this EP about meditation from Andrew Huberman: https://youtu.be/wTBSGgbIvsY It’s the first time I saw someone differentiating different types of meditation and it seems to
19.
by estevaoam 4y ago
If you have a couple years worth of your monthly expenses in your savings then I wouldn’t be so worried about it. What you have done with that is to buy you time while you figure out the situation. This is enough for most problems you would
20.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Perhaps you’re just generalizing your social bubble? I use Copilot and I find it’s pretty useful. I don’t use it to write whole functions though, but the autocomplete gets it right 7 out of 10.
21.
by estevaoam 4y ago
I recalled immediately about the quantum vibrations hypothesis which Penrose helped create: https://youtu.be/VG8_hlnFdWM Although it sounds weird the reasoning and explanation on microtubules is pretty fascinating. If you’r
22.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Not a technical trick but this helps immensely when designing an application: always start with good problem decomposition and draft the technical components and their interfaces derived directly from that. What I realized over my career is
23.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Sure, because having a synthetic intelligence that seems to understand complex concepts to create coherent visual art is something humans are used to.
24.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Thanks for the time you dedicated to check it out and reply to me here, it really makes me happy. The responsive version is buggy indeed, sorry for that. This will be my focus on the coming days and should be improved very soon. I was caugh
25.
Show HN: Resumecreator.io – I built a simple resume builder(resumecreator.io)
7 points by estevaoam 4y ago|3 comments
26.
by estevaoam 4y ago
Exactly! My doctor made an analogy of taking meds with wearing glasses for sight correction: you don’t need to use it at all times, but if you do want to see properly then you do need them. Out of curiosity: may I ask which medication are y
27.
by estevaoam 4y ago
I was diagnosed with somewhat severe ADHD, hyperactive and attention subtype. I have few tips to share: 1. Find your medication. After I found mine with the correct dosage, my life improved ten fold. Our dopamine system is wired differently
28.
by estevaoam 4y ago
With all due respect fellow HN reader, I never said his idea was great or revolutionary. When I posted my comment, most comments I read then haven't tried to discuss any specific points nor his ideas, and my comment was for those. Most
29.
by estevaoam 4y ago
I think Law of Jante summarizes the 'zeitgeist' of HN comments towards this man: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Jante The goal should be always to understand and discuss ideas, despite egos. As hard tha
30.
About Bounded Contexts and Microservices(blog.avanscoperta.it)
1 points by estevaoam 6y ago|0 comments

More ›