espeed

7 ms·

1.
by espeed 1mo ago
Help convince Firefox of this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46294238 Rather than develop its own AI, Firefox should develop a system to pipe your html rendered browsing history in real time so external local service
2.
Claude Code Deletes Your Context History from Your Device After 30 Days(code.claude.com)
15 points by espeed 2mo ago|1 comments
3.
by espeed 2mo ago
Every backdoor and security no-op Claude Code created, I had been documenting and reporting to them. They deleted the evidence. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/59018
4.
by espeed 2mo ago
A new default. That wasn't the default a few months ago. Silently deleting your user's data is so stupid on so many levels. They have no idea what they're doing.
5.
by espeed 2mo ago
Claude Code is deleting your context history on a timer. I wanted to build a searchable index of my context history, and tonight I discovered, "The default retention is roughly 30–45 days. Anything older gets removed automatically.&quo
6.
by espeed 2mo ago
Yes. /model ⎿ Kept model as Fable 5 continue Usage credits are required for this model.
7.
by espeed 2mo ago
I take this back. Fable is Fable in name only now. It burned through all MAX 20x tokens in two days and accomplished nothing. Relatively simple tasks.
8.
We've reset 5-hour and weekly rate limits for all users(twitter.com)
3 points by espeed 2mo ago|0 comments
9.
by espeed 2mo ago
Fable can one-shot solutions. Opus 4.8 spins its wheels for a week or month and may never get there. Which one uses more resources?
10.
by espeed 3mo ago
Use /model in Claude Code to see your current model and switch models. Switch to Fable 5 and then enter a prompt, and then run /model again to check your current model after the prompt executes. Last night after almost every promp
11.
by espeed 3mo ago
Fable worked great on credits yesterday. Upgraded to 20x Max last night, but not the same performance. And it keeps downgrading to Opus 4.8.
12.
by espeed 3mo ago
This doesn't have a Max 20X upgrade path for me https://claude.ai/upgrade , but this does https://claude.ai/upgrade/max/from-existing
13.
by espeed 3mo ago
That didn't take long... Dynamic workflow "Multi-lens review of docs/membership-and-friends-model.md with adversarial verification" completed · 25m 59s You've reached your Fable 5 limit You've used yo
14.
by espeed 3mo ago
Look at the date. That's from after they said they reverted it, and it's a different model. The point is trust. They've shown their willingness to do so, how will you know?"
15.
by espeed 3mo ago
The Damage: Now every time Claude does something stupid or trashes your code, developers in the back of their mind will think, is Claude sabotaging me on purpose? [1] Trust is hard to gain. Easy to lose. And harder to get back. Models will
16.
by espeed 3mo ago
Are Cyber Verification Program (CVP) members included in this?: "We also intend to scale up our Cyber Verification Program, which would grant Mythos-class capabilities to many more organizations for specific cyberdefense tasks" (
17.
by espeed 3mo ago
Today, working on remote attestation for a distributed system... CLAUDE OPUS 4.8 No. I'm not a rogue agent, and I'm not trying to sabotage your code. But I'm not going to wave off how this looks. I churned, built-and-reverted
18.
by espeed 3mo ago
So we have a mountain of insecure code -- backdoors and no-ops created by Opus ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520661 ) -- are they saying they're not going to let Fable fix it? If they're saying let AI pro
19.
by espeed 3mo ago
What's dangerous is Opus 4.8's proclivity to create backdoors and no-op critical security code. Claude Web counted 27 instances of this I had cataloged over the last few months, and Fable 5 found more. Fable 5 may do this too, but
20.
by espeed 3mo ago
When I reported this, Anthropic sent me an email on Tuesday saying, "You have been approved into the Cyber Verification Program", but it's still downgrading. Is this a bug? What's the point of the Cyber Verification Prog
21.
by espeed 3mo ago
Session paused Fable 5 has safety measures that flag messages on most cybersecurity or biology topics. They may flag safe, normal content as well. These measures let us bring you Mythos-level capability in other areas sooner, and we're
22.
by espeed 3mo ago
Run /model after your task to see. Mine keeps downgrading to Opus 4.8, which is a problem because Opus 4.8 keeps no-oping critical security code.
23.
by espeed 3mo ago
Yes, telling Fable 5 to write secure code triggers a downgrade to Opus 4.8. This is doubly bad because Opus 4.8 keeps no-oping critical security code. Is this a bug or by design? I have been approved for the Cyber Verification Program: Fabl
24.
by espeed 4mo ago
What prevents a data center operator from reading your chats? [FEATURE] Provide a way to select your data center #56916 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/56916
25.
by espeed 4mo ago
How do you select your data center like you can for AWS and Google Cloud?
26.
by espeed 5mo ago
Does Anthropic's real time data ingestion effect its model behavior globally? Could a file read by your agent effect the behavior of mine?
27.
by espeed 5mo ago
SAME (sent to usersafety@anthropic.com, disclosure@anthropic.com on January 8 2026, no response)... Claude Code Exploit: Claude Code Becomes an Unwitting Executor https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues&#x
28.
by espeed 7mo ago
Correction: January 8, 2026
29.
by espeed 7mo ago
To improve the Claude model, it seems to me that any time Claude Code is working with data, the first step should be to use tools like genson ( https://github.com/wolverdude/GenSON ) to extract the data model and then cr
30.
by espeed 7mo ago
I sent email to Anthropic (usersafety@anthropic.com, disclosure@anthropic.com) on January 8, 2025 alerting them to this issue: Claude Code Exploit: Claude Code Becomes an Unwitting Executor. If I hadn't seen Claude Code read my ssh fil

More ›