esmevane

6 ms·

1.
by esmevane 11mo ago
The OP quit, publicly, and the response (and your post) miss that entirely. They aren't interested in a personal chat, and they aren't inviting anyone to help them process their feelings. They've left, and told everyone why.
2.
by esmevane 2y ago
The laws have been selectively enforced and it has led us here, yes, and it does mean that broad support of the bureaucracy has justifiably waned. Was it okay then, when it was a bureaucratic governing class encamping in the public coffers?
3.
by esmevane 2y ago
The entire bulk of what you're saying is _also_ a process, and _also_ hasn't been obeyed. Obedience to the law is obeisance to the process.
4.
by esmevane 2y ago
No, that isn't correct. Clearance is a process and it hasn't been obeyed, and the ultimate purpose of it is to both audit potential recipients and train them in security protocols. The president can't elude it, though he can
5.
by esmevane 2y ago
This is philosophizing, and it isn't even on topic. The laws are broken, so regardless of what you think "should" be legal, it isn't. They are being selectively enforced, though, and that's both the problem and prob
6.
by esmevane 2y ago
It's always played out like this in software, by the way. Famously, animation shops hoped to save money on production by switching over to computer rendered cartoons. What happened instead is that a whole new industry took shape, and b
7.
by esmevane 2y ago
Oh my, no. Fabrics and things made from fabrics remain largely produced by human workers. Those textile workers were afraid machines would replace them, but that didn't happen - the work was sent overseas, to countries with cheaper lab
8.
by esmevane 2y ago
Short response: I agree it's a problem but it isn't incumbent on the 'x' peers to solve it. The burden of that goes to any supposed '10x'. Long version: I agree with you, though I would add that a superintellec
9.
by esmevane 3y ago
Why would they not be over it, then? It's clearly made an impression.
10.
by esmevane 3y ago
I think maybe you ought to think about inverting your stance on this, because it's not necessarily virtuous to imagine that everyone repeating the same warning, over and over again, is due to some mysterious, inexplicable negativity. A
11.
by esmevane 3y ago
I like to think of it as `view, effects = fn(state, events)`, where effects are any subsequent events or instructions that come out of a state change. I think of it very close to how you're outlining it here, though, and when I'm
12.
by esmevane 3y ago
In this case, "community is moving in that direction" means that over the last 3+ years, a significant amount of middleware and tooling has grown in the Tower ecosystem, which Axum is based on. So the network effect is the draw he
13.
by esmevane 3y ago
No, I definitely get that. Where your data is, or is not, has no relevance to a network member choosing to behave badly or harmfully against that network. Nor does it actually impact what they can do to the network itself. It simply provide
14.
by esmevane 3y ago
That doesn't seem like a mitigation to what the poster above you said, to me. It just means that if I don't like it, I don't lose my posts when I move. That's nice but it offers no guarantees in the face of a corporate a
15.
by esmevane 9y ago
This was the first overview I read, and it's pretty good (but incomplete): https://github.com/reactjs/react-basic
16.
by esmevane 10y ago
I believe it's Gitbook - https://github.com/GitbookIO/gitbook
17.
by esmevane 11y ago
I had a pretty decent working example of coupling the two earlier this year: http://beatmatch.esmevane.com/ I wired things up using a Flux-like architecture, where the Store would periodically signal a data change and the
18.
by esmevane 13y ago
I completely agree. Additionally, in the process of mimicking code, the only thing I could do was think about what I was writing - and in some cases I discovered that I would have done it differently than some of the libraries I use every d
19.
by esmevane 13y ago
This article was written in 2009 by Jason Fried.
20.
by esmevane 13y ago
So Nintendo has not chosen to take their world-renowned franchises and use them to crop-share on iOS, and we're calling this a failure to capitalize on an opportunity? I don't think I could disagree more. These franchises are a tr
21.
by esmevane 13y ago
I doubt it. Does Facebook allow Google access to the signals it would need to weigh the relevant results?
22.
by esmevane 13y ago
What's with this attitude? This is someone's personal project.
23.
by esmevane 14y ago
In the case of Marvel, the 3.99 physical titles come with a digital backup.
24.
by esmevane 14y ago
Here you go http://thesecretlifeofcomicbooks.blogspot.com/2013/03/marvel...
25.
by esmevane 14y ago
Hold on: isn't there actual research which indicate improvements both in conversion rate and overall user retention / lifetime value with applications that feature tooltip tutorials on the first-run experience? Are you referencing research
26.
by esmevane 14y ago
That is awesome. Thanks for digging it up There's at least two projects I have going at the day job which have been experiencing slowdown - and I had no idea that small-batch DOM interaction was the culprit. Looks like I've got some optimi
27.
by esmevane 14y ago
Well, I'm pretty much going to use this approach from now on. Much cleaner and concise. If you look at the gist history you can see me updating my old code to include fat arrow, and other intuitive-with-experience tricks that I didn't kno
28.
by esmevane 14y ago
This is unrelated to the discussion at hand, but: I'd been writing JS for a while, but it wasn't until I picked up CoffeeScript that I really grasped JS. I know that sounds strange, but CoffeeScript taught me important concepts in JS which
29.
by esmevane 14y ago
This is the pattern I go with: https://gist.github.com/2931439 It decouples a little more logic from the template, and I think it adheres very closely with some things Backbone expects (like passing through the entire el to the DOM).
30.
by esmevane 14y ago
I think the tone I'm picking up on is that he should do this: Not make a post complaining about poor Android sales. There is no "should have done" past-tense about what these people are saying. It's good that he released the application an

More ›