Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eraser215
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
eraser215
1y ago
bootc is a CNCF project now, so anybody can get on board.
2.
▲
by
eraser215
1y ago
Totally. Appliances are perfect candidates for this tech.
3.
▲
by
eraser215
1y ago
Arguably yes. I think the big improvement is that an upgrade is really just switching from image A to image B, rather than dozens to hundreds of individual package transactions. Furthermore parts of the system are fully mutable (e.g. /
4.
▲
by
eraser215
1y ago
... and it works fabulously. I have been running Bluefin (same folks as Bazzite) from one of these templates for about 6 months and it has been a near on flawless experience. I have moved from Fedora 40->41->42 without having to touch
5.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
Flatpak doesn't auto update out of the box on any distro I have used.
6.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
I'm all in on bluefin-dx too, and Bluetooth is working fine for me in my lenovo x1 carbon. Fingers crossed you can sort your issue out.
7.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
Fair call. In any case I think you'll find things moving towards bootc and away from having to know rpm-ostree at all. The bootc documentation for fedora is pretty good and the Universal Blue project has built some awesome distros that
8.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
Which ABI has red hat broken between minor versions? Can you give some examples that weren't bugs that got fixed?
9.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
Alma is based on centos stream. Centos stream is red hat.
10.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
But you'll build your business on software you get for free on the internet with absolutely no commitment behind it?
11.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
What breaking changes do those upgrades introduce? Is there any compatibility guide?
12.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
... And we all know that rolling upgrades frequently introduce breaking changes that don't make sense for enterprise environments. To your (great) point: Customers pay companies like red hat for software stability, both in how it works
13.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
Is the problem ultimately to do with your configurations on your centos 7 boxes? Converting to rhel should be easy if you aren't doing anything that red hat wouldn't support in rhel.
14.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
CentOS stream is red hat.
15.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
We all know it's just made up stuff to feed the narrative of evil IBM making RH evil. Not even the plausible scenario of IBM changing the source code licencing of hashicorp software back to something genuinely open can change people&#x
16.
▲
by
eraser215
2y ago
Which alley do you mean?
17.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
"Or are they just planning to ship Redhat verbatim and never make their own stuff?" That is their stated mission.
18.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
[flagged]
19.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
Your final sentence proves just how little you understand about FOSS. Thanks for making it easy.
20.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
Good point. In pure play OSS nobody has come close, for sure. My understanding is that the only other software company that had the same sustained growth trend was salesforce. Could be wrong though.
21.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
I spotted that too. By contrast I'd prefer this person shouted it out loud without code so that everybody could see them for who they are.
22.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
Almost everything you said here is complete garbage. Underperform the rest of the tech sector? No... 70+ quarters of successive double digit growth until the acquisition. Mismanaged the company with respect to virtualisation? You're co
23.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
You do know red hat contributes far more to upstream kubernetes than suse/rancher don't you? You know they helped google open source it, don't you? Rancher certainly got the jump on red hat for lighter weight deployments, but
24.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
How dare a vendor come up with an idea, pay people to execute on that idea, and the gasp try to make money from it? Outrageous!
25.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
Oracle, SUSE, and Greg Kurtzer have zero interest in not profiting from this.
26.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
It's been made abundantly clear by many people in many places that this isn't an IBM thing.
27.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
100%
28.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
How is red hat being the only contributor a good thing?
29.
▲
by
eraser215
3y ago
Yes you can. https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/new-year-new-red-hat-enterpri...