enigmurl

7 ms·

1.
by enigmurl 17d ago
Not yet unfortunately, there is an export to markdown but I'm assuming you're looking for something related to the events. I'm going to work on this and get it out soon
2.
Show HN: KnotQ – Calendar and Organization Planner(knotq.com)
3 points by enigmurl 22d ago|2 comments
3.
Show HN: Monocurl – Interactive STEM animation language and IDE(monocurl.com)
3 points by enigmurl 4mo ago|1 comments
4.
by enigmurl 3y ago
More so the former
5.
Show HN: Monocurl – open-source GUI for animating math videos and slideshows(monocurl.com)
6 points by enigmurl 3y ago|2 comments
6.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Presumably GP was implying that adding a second plane increases the chance of a crash, not claiming that it increases the conseuqences should it happen
7.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Assuming it's a reference to RLHF? Not sure
8.
by enigmurl 3y ago
$1.2 billion per month would be $14.4 billion per year
9.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Would it really be lower on the bot net in the majority of cases? I'd imagine that real users probably wouldn't want to have their entire cpu spent on this.
10.
by enigmurl 3y ago
In general, it's pretty hard to establish that an algorithm is "not useful" for a particular discipline.
11.
by enigmurl 3y ago
I understand that it may be viewed as unpleasant, but ultimately if you install a proxy on your end that the server does not like (say an ad-blocker), I don't think it would be fair for the server to say its suffering a MITM attack. Li
12.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Man in the middle attack typically implies an unwanted third party, which in this case is not true since Cloudfare is explicitly and voluntarily trusted by the host server. It wouldn't be all that different if the web server had the br
13.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Isn't the point that Cloudfare is essentially enforcing the rules then?
14.
by enigmurl 3y ago
If it's truly the case that you're paying for Google Search, that would be an even bigger incentive for consumers to leave to a different search engine (in essence, they would be paid to switch).
15.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Texas operates its own independent electrical grid (presumably to avoid federal energy regulations, though I'm not sure)[1], whereas the rest of America operates roughly on two interstate grid regions. I would agree that it's igno
16.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Sure, but with that kind of argument will we ever be able to make the switch to a better vcs if one exists? You have to start somewhere.
17.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Allows you to sign in on (iPhone) apps a bit easier I would image
18.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Isnt this more analogous to an end-to-end encrypted group chat than a backdoor?
19.
by enigmurl 3y ago
I was speaking somewhat hypothetically, as for now I would agree that it's tenuous at best to call self driving cars safer. My point was more that even if they were provably safer, people would have ego problems in claiming they are mo
20.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Even the majority of people who are so called bad drivers have killed zero people, and no one is going to call themselves a bad driver, fewer are going to admit an AI is better at them (even if it's statistically true).
21.
by enigmurl 3y ago
Ah I see, fair point then I would agree.
22.
by enigmurl 3y ago
You could argue that for any service provider then. Why is Intel selling CPUs when it could be making profit from the cloud data centers themselves?
23.
by enigmurl 3y ago
In which case, wouldn't Apple be offering an advantage in comparison to the android eco system, and therefore deserve the right to charge money for it?
24.
by enigmurl 3y ago
It's not actually the essence of the problem, it's just one of many complications...