endiangroup

6 ms·

1.
by endiangroup 4mo ago
AD: You missed the part about CRDT's!
2.
by endiangroup 4mo ago
AD: Big shout to our community member Defelo for maintaining those! Come join in!
3.
by endiangroup 4mo ago
AD: Radicle is protocol driven, my hope as a contributor is it becomes infrastructure.
4.
by endiangroup 4mo ago
AD: Theres a project `artifact-cob` [^1] that enables some of the functionality you are looking for. You can host artifacts off-network and make 'releases' that point to them. [^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com/#n
5.
by endiangroup 4mo ago
AD: We've just been discussing this! There's an open RIP [^1] that we will be supplying feedback for soon. [^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/369876-RIPs/to...
6.
by endiangroup 4mo ago
AD: We're definitely interested in hearing about the rough edges and opinions! Feel free to post on our Zulip [^1] if you haven't already :). [^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com/
7.
by endiangroup 4mo ago
AD: Feel free to post on our Zulip [^1] about your experiences of agentic workflow if you haven't already! Some of the team are interested in developing the agentic workflow experience. [^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com&#x
8.
by endiangroup 4mo ago
AD: The website is currently being redesigned, I suspect we'll have it up in the next few weeks. No it doesn't currently support other VCS's but we have planned for that possibility in future!
9.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: Those are fair points, feel free to jump on our [zulip]( https://radicle.zulipchat.com/#recent ) and start a discussion there!
10.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: Thanks for engaging in a constructive way! I agree trust is a hard problem when your coming from a problem<>solution framing. Trust is pretty abundant in our day-to-day lives if not a slightly backgrounded, for example; I trust my
11.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: I have to clock off now, but I'll get back to this, I appreciate the well thought out response!
12.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: Feel free to take a stab at an alternative, we're an open source project and we accept and welcome discussions but patches more so! What would read better in your opinion?
13.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: I'll take a stab, but I am a new joiner! Each repository is governed by an identity document which is signed by a set of delegates, each delegate currently corresponds 1:1 to someones ssh-key. We are working to adjust this mechanis
14.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: We're looking ad introducing 'forgetting' as a feature, there may be a mutually beneficial way of signalling to permissive seeds when content is no longer relevant or stale or actively been flagged for removal.
15.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: We're actively working on that issue right now, making the defaults safer. We're also discussing internally how to enable revocation of content at the network level. It won't be perfect, but neither is GitHub or the likes
16.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: Whats holding you back from using it as your primary?
17.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: Thank you for your contribution! I also run a permissive seed node, vote by participation!
18.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: The prefix is my initials :) - my only HN account is a shared one with a co-op organisation I work through. I use AD to distinguish who's commenting... however my co-workers have yet to use this account ha!
19.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: Pull requests are `patches` in radicle, when you clone a repository you create a git namespace for yourself from which you can edit to your hearts desire, you can then open patches to other repos via this mechanism.
20.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: You have control over what you seed, if you are a permissive node you accept all content on the network, but by default your local node will only seed what you instruct it too.
21.
by endiangroup 8mo ago
AD: Newly joined protocol dev here, feel free to ask questions!
22.
by endiangroup 1y ago
AD: Huh! I just wrote a utility cmd [1] this weekend to deal with restricting ssh keys to executing only commands that match a rule set via `ForceCommand` in `sshd_config` or `Command=""` in `authorized_keys`. I'm curious to
23.
by endiangroup 2y ago
[AD] Oh wow! I've not found someone working on the same issue, I wrote a short paper on a method to identify remotely running software [1]. I'd love to get your opinion! [1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4
24.
by endiangroup 2y ago
[AD] I've wrote a short paper on this; Remote Software Identification -- Zero Trust Remote Software Verification [1] after reading a blog post by GUIX - and I've provide PoC code in Go [2]. It utilises a hash chain log server side
25.
by endiangroup 2y ago
To be clear I didn't say "don't model" - models can have value but all models are wrong because the map is not the territory. That's a first order problem, any representation of something is not the thing itself and
26.
by endiangroup 2y ago
Having studied complexity from a computational perspective (via Santa Fe Institute and 1st wave Cybernetics) and a natural sciences one (via Dave Snowden and Alicia Juarrero) my preference is to stay away from modelling complex systems part
27.
by endiangroup 3y ago
AD: Yes, what a wonderful application of tech. I very much enjoy seeing these hardware <> software open source projects. Congratulations on developing a finished project.
28.
by endiangroup 3y ago
AD: I have to disagree with the assumption there are only 3 communication forms (work, async, sync) - it's not hard to fathom a counter example such as Pairing where-in synchronous communication is necessary for the pair's flow st
29.
by endiangroup 3y ago
SEEKING CO-FOUNDER | Recruitment Tech | CEO/Sales | UK/EU/US | Pre-Seed I'm a co-founder of gethigher.io, we provably increase the signal to noise ratio for open market recruiting at a lower cost point than agencies. We
30.
by endiangroup 4y ago
AD: and here I was about to appeal to HN to get this article over to you! Hope it inspires another version, you had some wonderful novel concepts in your lock(s).

More ›