elpin

7 ms·

1.
by elpin 5y ago
It shows they wanted to prevent Hillary from building supporters to hurt her campaign and were explicitly strategizing how to achieve that end: "if you have anything hillary related we want it in the next tweo [sic] days prefable [sic]
2.
by elpin 5y ago
"On July 6, 2016, WikiLeaks again contacted Guccifer 2.0 through Twitter’s private messaging function, writing, “if you have anything hillary related we want it in the next tweo [sic] days prefable [sic] because the DNC is approaching
3.
by elpin 6y ago
Key phrases being " broad sets of documents" from the comment you're responding to and "reports or answers in writing to specific questions" in the FTC's blurb.
4.
by elpin 6y ago
I think there's a fair argument that groups attempting to make a specific product are more likely to drive platform development than random individuals who just want to noodle around. This isn't to say that the more individual exp
5.
by elpin 6y ago
I was curious and did some research about the "Everlywell" food allergy test this article recommends, and the evidence behind it seems INCREDIBLY weak. From what I'm reading the product seems to be some Shark Tunk funded non-
6.
by elpin 6y ago
Yeah, I was also curious and did some research about the "Everlywell" food allergy test this article recommends, and the evidence behind it seems INCREDIBLY weak. From what I'm reading the product seems to be some Shark Tunk
7.
by elpin 6y ago
Hey, the website that you use to host your report you cite (quark.cards) has an expired certificate, and a whois shows it belongs StackFrame, just FYI since I saw you listed as working there. I noticed the "Wikipedia's list of Am
8.
by elpin 6y ago
This is addressed in the Wikipedia page under "Criticisms of quadratic voting mechanisms". Potential solutions include giving everyone the same amount of starting artificial "money", using one-person-one-vote when issues