elicash

5 ms·

1.
by elicash 3d ago
This is not me putting some unrelated pet issue into this topic; to evaluate David Sack's post arguing against government regulation, it's entirely fair to examine whether he has been consistent. He hasn't. He supported a gov
2.
by elicash 3d ago
A principled individual could dislike Anthropic and still not favor using government to punish speech.
3.
by elicash 3d ago
David Sachs wants to use government to punish people he disagrees with politically, like Dario. He supported the Department of War's illegal actions against Anthropic. He supported the Trump administration's temporary export contr
4.
by elicash 4d ago
I haven't used a foldable. Is it hard to click on buttons, for example, that happened to be place down the seam? Or has that type of thing been long solved?
5.
by elicash 4d ago
The product isn't out yet. I imagine there will be a setting for dock on left or right, if that's what you're referencing.
6.
by elicash 5d ago
It was 1991 and 2002 AUMFs that were repealed in December 2025. I appreciate the correction. (That said, the 2001 AUMF hasn't been invoked against Iran.)
7.
by elicash 5d ago
There is no AUMF, and I believe Congress already repealed previous ones? I thought the remaining issues were a dispute related to the timing requirements in the War Powers Resolution, plus unsettled Constitutional law.
8.
by elicash 6d ago
I think that's a smart point and seems likely to be attempted. It presents interesting questions, though. Right now, insurance companies are incentivized to fight for their customer in court against the other driver because they don&#x
9.
by elicash 7d ago
I think insurance companies might beat the regulators, in terms of incentivizing safer vehicles via discounts. Which would then offset these monthly subscriptions by car companies.
10.
by elicash 7d ago
1. After reading this article, I'm going to hear this music https://youtu.be/KVdqwD_bcPs?si=qo_3_9yZWiW3zEQW&t=86 in my head the next time I'm waiting for a response from my LLM. 2. The author understandably t
11.
by elicash 7d ago
Apple should have put these videos out at WWDC. It would not have spoiled anything; everybody already knew the folding phone was coming and they could have just said it was related to any large device. Way too late for developers to tackle
12.
by elicash 7d ago
I remember that HN discussion, but it seemed to me from the outside that after that post they got Google as a sponsor and I just had assumed the community was rallying together for them a bit. But I guess not. Too bad, they seem like such g
13.
by elicash 20d ago
Demo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szW7N_7B3tU
14.
by elicash 21d ago
Same happened to me (with my very different prompt).
15.
by elicash 28d ago
I believe most anti-Flock folks are making a strategic error by focusing attention on these abuses. It allows them to merely roll out improvements that prevent this type of thing, while ignoring the more fundamental privacy issues at stake
16.
by elicash 1mo ago
Related: Pneumatic tube trash collection, in places like Roosevelt Island in NY https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_vacuum_collection I've always dreamed of a pneumatic tube burrito delivery system that went s
17.
by elicash 1mo ago
It's open source
18.
by elicash 1mo ago
I think tstrimple incorrectly thought it was a rhetorical question really meant to complain. But my interpretation was like yours, that it was good faith and a literal question.
19.
Cloudflare OS is an architecture of distrust(lord.technology)
4 points by elicash 1mo ago|0 comments
20.
by elicash 1mo ago
Seems to have been developed in 2008 (continuing through 2017), which explains the "economical" framing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Academy_of_Engineerin...
21.
by elicash 1mo ago
This is just if you don't want to host it yourself, no?
22.
by elicash 1mo ago
I had never heard of them. But anybody can make a mistake and it shows integrity to immediately remove a section with a disclaimer when prevented with contrary evidence. Not enough folks do this. You can have strong anti- "car-culture&
23.
by elicash 1mo ago
Interesting, I went to the link they gave and to the safety section and it says: > As of July 23, 2026, we have temporarily removed our safety analysis from this report, as well as relevant references to the analysis throughout the repor
24.
by elicash 2mo ago
"Whatever’s most faithful to the original" would be done with research, not random folks blind ranking. I think it's to their credit they frame it in terms of preference and enjoyment because that is more accurate to what the
25.
by elicash 2mo ago
Is this free or paid? There's no mention of cost, except on the terms page where it suggests you need to purchase to have a license to use it. This is a very nice collection. Edit: I see the change to the terms, that's perfect, th
26.
by elicash 2mo ago
There's that version of the argument version, but there's also the softer version: that there used to be no training material of illustrated pelicans on bicycles, but now you have actual artistically talented individuals drawing i
27.
by elicash 2mo ago
Maybe I’m just too anxious an individual. But also, I imagine the lawyers prepping helped. Interesting to hear your perspective on this as someone who went through it!
28.
by elicash 2mo ago
It is not overly dramatic to suggest getting a letter like this is INCREDIBLY scary.
29.
by elicash 2mo ago
I'm not a lawyer, but I would also guess they need to "flip" these folks against OpenAI and get them to cooperate in the lawsuit against the actual folks with big pockets. I think they're essentially alleging a conspirac
30.
by elicash 2mo ago
It's not the case that someone successful is doing everything right and someone unsuccessful is doing everything wrong, I'd grant. But I think it's odd for you to now say it doesn't matter whether or not his AI token use

More ›