ekleraki

5 ms·

1.
by ekleraki 3y ago
Can you find a link that shows that ICE / non hybrid and non ev make up the majority of cars with automatic start and stop?
2.
by ekleraki 3y ago
Again, mostly means majority and allows for exceptions.
3.
by ekleraki 3y ago
Mostly means the majority and by construction allows for exceptions.
4.
by ekleraki 3y ago
“Mostly” includes exceptions.
5.
by ekleraki 3y ago
From the ąrticle [1] references [2]: > fluoride intake levels (0.93 [0.43] vs 0.30 [0.26] mg of fluoride per day; P = .001). > Children had mean (SD) Full Scale IQ scores of 107.16 (13.26), range 52-143, with girls showing significant
6.
The Third Wave ( a Social Experiment )(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by ekleraki 3y ago|1 comments
7.
by ekleraki 3y ago
Submission statement: Given the comments on the psychological experiments conducted on Ted Kaczynski, I feel that sharing this experiment [again] is worthwhile. The following is an excerpt from the wikipedia page: ---- The Third Wave was an
8.
by ekleraki 3y ago
If we are being pedantic, transformers operate on integer vectors, and in the process turn them into high dimensional matrices.
9.
by ekleraki 3y ago
Part of releasing AWS products to customers involves getting cleared by AppSec plus other compliance teams. The products are supposed to be ready months in advance before the AppSec and other teams start working on them. For whatever reason
10.
by ekleraki 3y ago
> As an example, we're not far from some arguing against the existence of a great many people because an AI can objectively do their jobs better. We are already here. The problem is that everyone seems to take capitalism as the defa
11.
by ekleraki 4y ago
> Ask it to solve novel mathematical and logic problems How exactly do you define novel tasks and problems? My brother has had it do his programming homework (he's a teenager), written in Greek mind you and therefore novel task to t
12.
by ekleraki 4y ago
You are correct my comment did not make sense. What I meant was that types may be inferred but that is not the same as dynamic typing.
13.
by ekleraki 4y ago
I’d add that this is a great opportunity for OP to treat it as akin to “rustlings” or a possible analogue, where they break different functions that they know work, and building it up again s.t. the tests pass fine.
14.
by ekleraki 4y ago
I am sorry that my messages have been misinterpreted. I wasn’t trying to gaslight or emotionally manipulate anyone. I didn’t imply that you are treating me differently either, and i am sorry my messages caused such feelings. I was genuinely
15.
by ekleraki 4y ago
Nothing I could express will ever be satisfying enough to convince, let alone persuade you into responding earnestly. Whether you respond to me it’s entirely up to you… you need to choose to believe that people can change, as I have changed
16.
by ekleraki 4y ago
I am asking you, as a trans person fearing for their life, how i should call the people i am terrified of, the people who seem to hate me for my mere existence without ever interacting with me, who have already decided that i am going to he
17.
by ekleraki 4y ago
Enlighten me then, if not with the word "fascist", how should I characterize the class of people that apparently wants me dead, and as a collective exhibit all 14 characteristics of Fascism as defined by Umberto Eco? Which word ha
18.
by ekleraki 4y ago
No blanket statements made. I spoke about the GOP, referring to the leadership. No blanket labeling. I merely continued the discussion from this context: > sometimes you can't have nice things because there are people who will abuse
19.
by ekleraki 4y ago
As the other comment said, there's difference between JAQing off and genuinely asking questions. If you wish to ask questions, there are places where you can very much do so, like r/honesttransgender. You can read papers on the to
20.
by ekleraki 4y ago
The word "fascist" was used to refer to a person who supports authoritarian regimes that attack minorities, education, reproductive rights, freedom of speech whenever they do not like said speech. I used it to refer to people in s
21.
by ekleraki 4y ago
I see your anecdotal data and I raise you my predictor variables: - Wears a maga hat - Supports forced pregnancies - Is evangelical christian - Is proudly unvaccinated - Considers him or her self a "pureblood" - Is proudly uneduca
22.
by ekleraki 4y ago
They are referring to Trump running on the platform of punishing doctors for offering gender affirming healthcare, and banning transitioning. Apparently stating facts is worthy of downvotes. Keep it classy HN.
23.
by ekleraki 4y ago
They do have a master's degree according to the post. The claims made are not that deep for researchers.
24.
by ekleraki 4y ago
It is slower to the same backprop that we have used for decades now. No comparisons to AdamW were made. In fact, this algorithm uses backprop at its core, but propagating through 0 layers.
25.
by ekleraki 4y ago
In my opinion, yes if and only if the update does not use a stateful optimiser, and the computation is easy / simple enough that the updated parameter value can be computed immediately. In linear layers, it is possible. Once you have c
26.
by ekleraki 4y ago
Let's suppose that you are correct, which direction are the weights updated towards? The implementations of this compute gradients locally.
27.
by ekleraki 4y ago
A single linear layer is for all intents and purposes equivalent to running an ensemble of linear estimators. By disallowing gradients to flow between two layers A, B, computing (B . f . A)(x) with f being a non linearity, the second layer
28.
by ekleraki 4y ago
My claim WAS that hormones affect activation patterns. That is a well supported claim. Changes in activation patterns affect our perceptions, our senses, and literally the medium by which we experience the world. They may not affect our per
29.
by ekleraki 4y ago
You could do this via Jupiter notebooks and visual studio code.
30.
by ekleraki 4y ago
You can take a look at the abstract and then look for related articles in English. You are dismissing articles that contradict your beliefs on the basis of lacking the capacity to read them, not of their content. No comment on the other 3 r

More ›