eithed

6 ms·

1.
by eithed 12d ago
Then why wouldn't they use a bulletin board that is dead? And according to https://collusion.wiki/ OpenAI did see the results on this board on 21 Jul, so why not make agents delete their traces?
2.
by eithed 12d ago
I'm dubious - if the agents were so smart that they've used a message board to coordinate and if they were to do it on other message boards that were not found, then why would this one be found? What makes it so different?
3.
by eithed 12d ago
Is it just me, or is it advertising? "Look at how smart our models are, they used this website to coordinate and share guidelines!"
4.
by eithed 13d ago
I can see porn on x.com without any issues (this is from top of my head regarding widely known websites that show adult content without any checks) On the flipside, I cannot buy any adult orientated games on Steam, because I don't have
5.
by eithed 24d ago
Dependable.
6.
by eithed 26d ago
I love that Gibsons cyberpunk is "realistic" and mundane (at this point): a girl replaces a virtual singer (Mona Lisa Overdrive), another girl steals glasses containing plans for urban redevelopment (Virtual Light), virtual world
7.
by eithed 29d ago
Be the change you want to see :) I've created myself a pre-commit harness hook to explicitly discard superfluous or too lengthy comments. Within code-review I also added comment review as blockers
8.
by eithed 1mo ago
Tests would have caught it = https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint injection check
9.
by eithed 1mo ago
The problem is that while I'm more efficient while utilising LLMs, I'm given more work. This is nothing new - it's just more spinning plates at the same time; previously though I'd just say "I have so many things I&
10.
by eithed 1mo ago
It's interesting that I had to close 3 popups just to read this article, two of them were for tracking cookies
11.
by eithed 1mo ago
I'm looking at these reports and then at my sessions with Claude. In latest one, it got stuck in a loop fixing one thing and breaking another for 10 iterations, until I've noticed and gave it the insight. Or where it started conti
12.
by eithed 2mo ago
It's not cynical - I read it like that as well. My agent is more dangerous than your agent and all that jazz
13.
by eithed 2mo ago
Lol if Trump is convicted of treason because some researchers didn't get a grant
14.
by eithed 2mo ago
Are you suggesting that Europeans should continuously use third party models be it American, Chinese or whatever?
15.
by eithed 2mo ago
The only place it make sense to me is the validation = at the route level you want to ensure that the given model exists / request attributes defining relationship (pivot), are there. This is how Laravel does this. Having said that thi
16.
by eithed 3mo ago
Mostly agree with the author. Would add, most importantly, dont trust anything LLM does or says. Today I asked Claude to uniform behaviour of 3 components. I asked to do it 5 times, because at the end of each go there was something still un
17.
by eithed 3mo ago
Same; the most infuriating parts - Claude caused the issue and Claude misdiagnosed the issue, making me spend more time than if I was debugging it myself.
18.
by eithed 3mo ago
Yes and no. If I were to ask you - what convention you want to follow for your database columns - camelcase or snakecase? There's no correct global answer. There's no overarching truth that should apply to all databases in exist
19.
by eithed 3mo ago
I agree and indeed externalize everything you know *that matters*. Want to follow certain pattern, or convention - define it, ie active record vs repository pattern, stick is as an ADR! You don't know what you want? Look at what Claude
20.
by eithed 3mo ago
> They conflate domain expertise with coding expertise, and then assess that people with domain expertise demonstrate great success at coding tasks I didn't read it as such - I read that people with expertise have more success in re
21.
by eithed 3mo ago
I'm tired of people not taking responsibility for things they do and not being held accountable for their actions - politicians mostly; for example - currently in Poland there's a controversy around Zondacrypto (read here: https:
22.
by eithed 3mo ago
Is it enshittification, or is USA simply turning into fascist state?
23.
by eithed 3mo ago
Leaving this here, as I couldn't leave it on authors blogpost: I grew accustomed to these choices, so would navigate through them on autopilot. Once I was quick enough to get "We noticed suspicious activity indicating that you&#x2
24.
by eithed 3mo ago
Ah, I see what you mean now. Yes, my mind went straight to static analysis and testing (unit, feature, uat, mutation). Thanks for expanding on your point!
25.
by eithed 3mo ago
https://www.danielzarick.com/uploads/2018-05-draw-the-owl.jp...
26.
by eithed 3mo ago
Don't forget that LLMs are trained on human code. If they cannot understand what your code does then they cannot make changes to it, or at least - having them understand your codebase becomes expensive (more trips to Anthropic servers)
27.
by eithed 3mo ago
I disagree. What I should have added is that with agents (as well as humans) you do need to have tests that verify what was done.
28.
by eithed 3mo ago
I mirror your thoughts. I think we'll end up with "perfect map" paradox = you cannot be vague or indecisive on what you want (and if you are then these decisions don't matter) and you're creating a 1:1 representatio
29.
by eithed 3mo ago
Exactly - the normalization of craft (?) is interesting
30.
by eithed 3mo ago
Don't forget that you can adjust your requirements (either via plan or skill) to ensure the mistakes do not happen. The problem is that neither LLMs, nor humans (that don't work with the domain) will know they made these mistakes

More ›