efilife

5 ms·

1.
by efilife 4d ago
> I do not understand what are you arguing against. Re-read the comment you replied to, and the one above
2.
by efilife 4d ago
https://yandex.com/images/search?from=tabbar&text=%D0%B1%D1%... For everyone to make the search themselves
3.
by efilife 6d ago
Not sure what the joke is but I now see that I replied to the wrong comment, thanks
4.
by efilife 6d ago
Didn't you post this one enough times already? Kinda spammy
5.
by efilife 6d ago
how does it filter posts?
6.
by efilife 7d ago
Not sure why this is flagged. It is not natively running on linux, it needs workarounds to run. He's right
7.
by efilife 7d ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49628715 top comment is all about the game being empty
8.
by efilife 11d ago
I do all of these three. I guess there's nothing wrong in this approach after all. It just boils down to "not push shitty commits"
9.
by efilife 11d ago
what was it?
10.
by efilife 12d ago
I do this. What's wrong with this approach and how should it be done correctly?
11.
by efilife 15d ago
Oh so it hits the LUFS target automatically? This wasn't presented in the video I got sent. Great stuff then!
12.
by efilife 16d ago
Resolve isn't special in what it's doing. This is a regular workflow that works like this in all software and isn't automated at all like you are claiming it is. It does not "prepare your audio". Bye
13.
by efilife 16d ago
> Audio dynamic compression means something different from file data compression. This is what I was trying to say. "You being at a -8 LUFS will not cause any more compression compared to you being at -14. " You ignored my poin
14.
by efilife 16d ago
Am I missing something? This is a very regular workflow that works the same in all software. It seems to provide you with a LUFS meter, then you manually adjust volume to what youtube expects you to. > normalize audio in a manner that su
15.
by efilife 17d ago
What do you mean? Like it can export audio to a separate file?
16.
by efilife 26d ago
Now we are curious what game it is
17.
by efilife 27d ago
I experienced the same lately. Even dug some of my old posts where I put in the effort and formatted them using reddit's markdown. Wouldn't dare it today
18.
by efilife 27d ago
Aren't you misremembering? I checked the first webarchive snapshots of this site and the site is almost the same as today https://web.archive.org/web/20251001004605/https://fulu.org/ Does the s
19.
by efilife 27d ago
He said that it sucks and we all know it does. I think there's a big difference between vibecoding a product in a week and blogspamming to promote it and running a legitimate business for the past 15 years, and suddenly getting deliste
20.
by efilife 27d ago
Watch the video, he shows what was on the website. Additionally, it only recently fell off google while it was in perfect standing for many many years.
21.
by efilife 27d ago
he explained why he does that. In short, he was fighting to be displayed in search results by having legitimate content on the site for months, but the traffic was dying day by day and killing his business. He then asked Gemini to write him
22.
Monty Hall Problem(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by efilife 1mo ago|0 comments
23.
by efilife 1mo ago
About your second point, how is it done today?
24.
by efilife 1mo ago
isn't this happening already? There's the concept called "thinking" where the models talks with itself before giving you the final answer
25.
by efilife 1mo ago
Same. I no longer tolerate this bullshit
26.
by efilife 1mo ago
Possibly didn't have the time to comment on this yet. Last comment is from 10h ago
27.
by efilife 1mo ago
Clickbait. Title makes it sound like they pay them directly to promote the platform, but they get paid through facebook content monetisation program
28.
by efilife 1mo ago
There's even a typo there, a space on one side of an em-dash and not on the other. I'm serious, noticing this makes me believe it's 100% human written
29.
by efilife 1mo ago
And I thought that this was going to be about the number PI
30.
by efilife 2mo ago
> If you liked this piece, you should subscribe to my premium newsletter. It’s $70 a year, or $7 a month haven't even had a chance to read a word

More ›