ed56

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ed56 13y ago

   I wouldn't recommend going toe to toe with a technology company when there is nothing worthwhile to gain (If there is something worthwhile, then see a lawyer). Morally I think the project should be able to stay up. However, I would avo
2. 2.▲
   by ed56 13y ago

   There's a spider in front of this one. http://cryptogasm.com/webcams/webcam.php?id=22466
3. 3.▲
   by ed56 13y ago

   Because Stone Cold said so.
4. 4.▲
   by ed56 13y ago

   I don't know exactly why, but my guess is because it is an objectively small/unimportant news story that has been analyzed for multiple days, as you mention.
5. 5.▲
   by ed56 13y ago

   1. To me, abstractly, a software engineer is someone who can going into a new language/situation and the result would be the best possible outcome given the supplied circumstances. 2. I think it would be fair to call yourself a software eng
6. 6.▲
   by ed56 13y ago

   Why is this chlidish article upvoted? This sounds like moaning from a 7th grade kid who just learned Javascript.
7. 7.▲
   by ed56 13y ago

   Really? "Despite speculation on the Internet that Summly only licensed its summarizing technology from SRI International, an independent research institute, Mr. D’Aloisio said the technology was developed by Summly and that the company owne
8. 8.▲
   by ed56 13y ago

   To the author: Would you have not taken a buyout offer from Yahoo! if you were in this kids position? All HN discussions regarding this topic have just screamed jealousy/disdain. It is as if people come to HN to read an intelligent argument