echion

6 ms·

1.
by echion 2mo ago
So many people proving your point by missing it.
2.
by echion 3mo ago
Where? Going to Shenzhen soon after a long hiatus and need tips.
3.
by echion 4mo ago
Thanks for that link -- deserves more attention.
4.
by echion 5mo ago
> Free Software types already do for all software Free Software types also create software...they didn't just argue for a better license and try to regulate Sun/others to re-license their software; they wrote free (libre) ver
5.
by echion 6mo ago
Looks excellent -- thanks; shame older intel macs don't get it (a lot of those still around)
6.
by echion 7mo ago
Any place we can look for you to release this?
7.
by echion 7mo ago
Ad hominem much?
8.
by echion 7mo ago
Those of us whose appreciation of da Vinci's mastery are not affected by him painting the Mona Lisa with a moustache are keeping you in our thoughts. (non-snark: your reply is clever and got a smile but I still think the GP post is ove
9.
by echion 7mo ago
Same here
10.
by echion 8mo ago
> Tiananmen square The Tiananmen Square killings happened independent of one's "worldview". What's an example of "the exact same thing" done to OpenAI models by western governments?
11.
by echion 9mo ago
> you can combine Spark with M3U, the former streaming the compute, lowering TTFT, the latter doing the token generation part Are you doing this with vLLM, or some other model-running library/setup?
12.
by echion 9mo ago
> training smart LLMs like Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct-NVFP4 Sounds interesting; can you suggest any good discussions of this (on the web)?
13.
by echion 9mo ago
> with same success you can prove bias in western models. What are some examples? (curious, as a westerner) Are there "bias" benchmarks? (I ask, rather than just search, because: bias)
14.
by echion 9mo ago
> when do we stop this kind of polarization? When the tool isn't polarized. I wouldn't use a wrench with an objectionable symbol on it. > You don't forecast weather with image detection model What do you do with a larg
15.
by echion 9mo ago
> I'm tired of this example everyone tests out, I think it undermines the researchers and engineers hard work. It's completely valid, IMO. If the researchers and engineers want their work to be not be judged based on what poli
16.
by echion 9mo ago
Can you elaborate a bit on your setup if you have time?
17.
by echion 1y ago
It's not supported by dhcpcd yet: https://github.com/NetworkConfiguration/dhcpcd/issues/341
18.
by echion 1y ago
Oh, itsdrewmiller pointed us in the right direction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44551579
19.
by echion 1y ago
Ironically, this fell off the HN front page without enough upvotes...neither hackernews.coffee nor Claude suggested it to me...
20.
by echion 1y ago
Normally I would say you're right, but I read the context opposite to you; I read the "fine" as a straight/literal statement: the author of "this is fine" is disputing the author's parent's statement
21.
by echion 1y ago
"Axial motors" don't seem to have been discussed much here; In 2022 there was some discussion of the flaws ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30816149 ).
22.
WSJ These Electric Motors Could Help Break the Dependence on China(wsj.com)
3 points by echion 1y ago|4 comments
23.
by echion 1y ago
Conifer motors is making a low-cost power plant for everything from scooters to factories
24.
by echion 1y ago
> iPhone [...] blasting an alarm in my ear at regular volume if I happen to be talking on the phone when [the alarm] goes off This always gets me...is there not a public bug report for this one?
25.
by echion 2y ago
> Lots of little technical reasons why not. What are some?
26.
by echion 2y ago
> To be able to select from a table you need > * CONNECT > * USAGE > * SELECT Isn't LOGIN ( https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/role-attributes.html ) also needed? Only roles that have the LOGIN
27.
by echion 3y ago
hmu
28.
by echion 3y ago
It's supposed to be the introduction to rigorous proof, so it is supposed to be "the first book on [formal] mathematics" for its audience.
29.
by echion 3y ago
> if you're not comfortable with the basics of mathematical proofs, then you're not ready for the subject of linear algebra That's quite far from what the author of the book you're discussing wrote: > [this book&#x
30.
by echion 3y ago
> this book is meant for the audience who can read and write proofs It seems like the opposite is true: "It is intended for a student who, while not yet very familiar with abstract reasoning, is willing to study more [than a] "

More ›