eadler

6 ms·

1.
by eadler 3d ago
Responding to you generally and not to this comment. I want to thank you for explaining economic principles even if the OP doesn't understand them. As someone who has less econ background then they'd like — your explanations are c
2.
by eadler 3d ago
Until the terms start including "mass arbitration" provisions limiting consumers ability to even use the psuesocourts the companies force.
3.
by eadler 6d ago
I agree with you to the point that I wrote this https://arbitrationinformation.org/docs/problems/
4.
by eadler 4mo ago
NAL but generally familiar with law. Medical (and especially therapy) notes, attorney/client communications, and a few other have privilege [1] and you would not /required/ to submit this. If the opposing side requested somet
5.
by eadler 6mo ago
You may enjoy https://forrt.org/ and in particular https://forrt.org/replication-hub/
6.
by eadler 6mo ago
I never knew the name of that device. Thanks
7.
by eadler 6mo ago
This is such a shame. It was the single best code pairing tool for the longest time and did not rely on mere screen sharing.
8.
by eadler 7mo ago
I've read this before. The first time you posted this. Your obsession with Obama and ignorance of current events are well known to me and everyone else who reads this site regularly. Please make an effort to apply your purported critic
9.
by eadler 7mo ago
... and if you can't differentiate between the badness of Obama and the badness of Trump you have neither integrity nor critical thinking skills.
10.
by eadler 9mo ago
I appreciated several of these quotes and added them to my own personal tracker. Thanks for linking this.
11.
by eadler 10mo ago
> You're reading research that says they're geniuses? I didn't say this > ... Re the rest. Thanks. I had implicitly assumed we were talking about financial or white collar crimes rather than all crimes. In other words t
12.
by eadler 10mo ago
> The reason criminals commit crimes is that criminals are dumb and have poor impulse control. What makes you believe this? Any data to support this claim? It's inconsistent with the majority of research I've read on the topic
13.
by eadler 10mo ago
1. You called the judge an "activist" which I don't agree with. Further if there were legitimate concerns about bias they could have requested that the judge recuse herself. It also ignores the, rightfully, failed appeals whi
14.
by eadler 10mo ago
You might enjoy this video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=D-XXZilkAXU
15.
by eadler 10mo ago
> * A single activist judge overruled shareholders false > * A high-achieving CEO was left with with zero compensation for a ten year period false > * Musk's compensation was agreed by a majority of shareholders both before an
16.
by eadler 1y ago
Yeah. Hearsay is an out of court statement provided to show the proof a matter. It has little to do with oral vs non oral. There are also exceptions, exceptions to the exceptions and so on.
17.
by eadler 2y ago
Is this actually the case? what about people who were promoted or moved positions? Is this the case for all federal jobs or can it be longer for some roles?
18.
by eadler 2y ago
What do you believe "probationary employees" means? What is their average tenure at the department?
19.
by eadler 2y ago
The article states that the lawsuit was rejected merely on procedural grounds (specifically the doctrine of administrative exhaustion) . It does not come close to stating that the action was legal. The actual court decison (which I have als
20.
by eadler 2y ago
This is starting to happen. I had to do this for NIH recently. Or it would be happening absent the recent chaos.
21.
by eadler 2y ago
The Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) precludes APA review amongst other relief (since it precludes district court jurisdiction entirely). That being said, this "termination" is likely invalid under the CSRA. Please see Elgin v. Dep
22.
by eadler 2y ago
I'd believe this in very specific contexts but I can't find any reliable explanation of what those might be. Can you point me to anything worthwhile to read on the topic? I am fairly certain that consumer and employment pre-di
23.
by eadler 2y ago
Relevant Law: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/5103 Good explanation: https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanlewis/2017/04/18/what-is-... Another distinction he
24.
by eadler 2y ago
This isn't true for the majority of operating systems.
25.
by eadler 2y ago
Not commenting on any other part but a slight correction: The morning after pill is not an abortifacient. While there are different types most (like Levonorgestrel) are antiovulatarory or anti fertilisation.
26.
by eadler 2y ago
Related: some fascinating history about the origin of the dreidel. Stephen Winick. (2022, December 13). The Truth Behind the Hanukkah Dreidel: Metafolklore, Play, and Spin | Folklife Today. The Library of Congress. https://blogs.
27.
by eadler 2y ago
Community notes was designed, implemented and released before the acquisition. Only the name is new. Previously it was called birdwatch.
28.
by eadler 2y ago
You also inspired me to go looking at this one [3]. I have not yet read it in full so please excuse any errors of understanding. (I have a backlog of 263 items at the moment). > These points represent at best pure speculation, which a fa
29.
by eadler 2y ago
Bear in mind this was written in 1928 in a very different legal context. In particular it was written before the Erie double-reversal [0]. Personally, I think it was poorly drafted by modern standards. Today, this particular exclusion would
30.
by eadler 2y ago
I used the ellipse for emphasis rather than dishonesty. The full quote was above. (If HN supported formatting I'd perhaps have used bold instead of ellipse+elision.) And yes. I read the full text of Circuit City including every footnot

More ›