eab-

5 ms·

1.
by eab- 3mo ago
This reminds me of Once Upon A Time in Shaolin .
2.
by eab- 3mo ago
> courts have found it to be legal ≠ ethical
3.
by eab- 3mo ago
they're spending like 9 figures on a single marketing agency - this doesn't surprise me whatsoever
4.
by eab- 4mo ago
Honestly I expect it's just annoyed devs getting annoyed about the ratelimits on plans and post-hoc justifying. Now that Codex has far more capacity and their slot machine makes better outcomes (note: I am a heavy LLM-assisted coder) t
5.
by eab- 5mo ago
is there examples of the sort of things that's been built with these systems? it often feels like complication and abstraction for its own sake
6.
by eab- 5mo ago
I used to have an emoji password for my Android phone, and had the exact same issue after a reset! It's an odd but pretty terrible failure mode for locking oneself out...
7.
by eab- 8mo ago
> We have proofs that are gigabytes (I believe even terabytes in some cases) in size, but we know they are correct because they check in Lean. I'm not aware of any of these. There's some SAT-like results that were not verified
8.
Running Lean at Scale(harmonic.fun)
67 points by eab- 8mo ago|6 comments
9.
by eab- 8mo ago
> Haha. How do you reconcile a proof with actual code? Languages like Lean allow you to write programs and proofs under the same umbrella.
10.
by eab- 8mo ago
I find it surprising that GPT managed to complete (with indeed a harness that doesn't seem very powerful!) and Claude still cannot.
11.
by eab- 8mo ago
I'd find this article a bit more compelling if it was used to find current introduced bugs, instead of just using a holdout set
12.
by eab- 9mo ago
My understanding is that also this tail call based interpretation is also kinder to the branch predictor. I wonder if this explains some of the slow downs - they trigger specific cases that cause lots of branch mispredictions.
13.
by eab- 1y ago
What do you mean about CLIP?
14.
by eab- 1y ago
There's both "no multi-program system" and "multi-program system", depending on how you look at it. In reality, you're always executing the same machine code, itself has no awareness of programs.
15.
by eab- 1y ago
a lot of the researchers are still in london
16.
by eab- 1y ago
The same Google that makes you log in again on like every other `gcloud` call? By copy pasting your password into the shell prompt?
17.
by eab- 1y ago
yep, this post is full of this post-rationalization, for example. it's pretty breathtaking
18.
by eab- 2y ago
The notifications aren't great, and the non-e-ink screen is a bit annoying. Also the low amount of physical buttons. But as someone who bought an OG Pebble and now has a Vivoactive 3, I think the fitness features are too nice to switch
19.
by eab- 2y ago
> Just insist on Lean (or some other formal verifier) proofs for everything Lean is too inflexible for this, in my opinion. Maybe I'm not dreaming big enough, but I think there'll have to be one more big idea to make this possi
20.
by eab- 2y ago
Why do you expect GPT being tuned on Lean will help it for research-level math?