e_l

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by e_l 8d ago

   Alternatively, they might train in a different manner than what you expect. They might have determined that your canaries (whether it is a unique string, URL or similar) have a low signal-to-noise ratio and not worth following up. Unless yo
2. 2.▲
   by e_l 8d ago

   Any break-through (even a partial solution) of Navier-Stokes would be a huge advancement. A famous (possibly apocryphal) quote by Werner Heisenberg goes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbulence#:~:text=Werner,firs... &
3. 3.▲
   by e_l 13d ago

   Because only one lucky person can own `fraser.name` at any one time in your model. And whilst that lucky person might be able to register their family members for free. There will be countless more (unrelated) Frasers who won't be able
4. 4.▲
   by e_l 22d ago

   I fear that the long-term result might be a small cartel of "trusted" companies that holds the private keys which can attest and lead to the death (or at least limiting widespread adopting) of open-source operating systems. It won
5. 5.▲
   by e_l 2mo ago

   > what should be done about open weight bioweapon and cyber-offense capabilities? Is it simply the cost of freedom that we should allow attackers to access these tools? In short, yes, it's the price of freedom. As others have said,