dzorz

5 ms·

1.
by dzorz 14y ago
FWIW iSSH on iOS has good X support.
2.
by dzorz 14y ago
This is part of your /etc/shadow file: root:censored We can still read /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key, etc. Edit: removed hash, sorry
3.
by dzorz 14y ago
clang uses the same ABI as gcc and if you find that something is binary incompatible then it is a bug.
4.
by dzorz 14y ago
> approximately 60Gb of storage Is that Gb or GB?
5.
by dzorz 15y ago
I use clang complete for vim. For me it is more precise than Visual Studio 2010 Intellisense (they use edg for code completion).
6.
by dzorz 15y ago
It uses heap only as a fallback if maximum recursion depth is reached. The key difference between __introselect and the posted article is that __introselect uses pivoting to (ideally) "throw" away half of the array during each step.
7.
by dzorz 15y ago
The original article uses heap to get top K numbers. It's runtime complexity is O(N*log(K)) and nth_element is O(N), so the algorithms are not similar at all.
8.
by dzorz 15y ago
Here is a solution in C++. It reads K and then N numbers from stdin and then prints K largest. The complexity of nth_element is O(N). #include <algorithm> #include <vector> #include <iostream> #incl
9.
by dzorz 15y ago
If you compile recent clang, it supports range based for loops. Using https://github.com/Rip-Rip/clang_complete you can use smart context-aware completion with vim/emacs. For example if you had this code: vector<string> vec; for (
10.
by dzorz 15y ago
Even better: for (auto &x : vec) { }
11.
by dzorz 15y ago
I managed to compile the program using shedskin, but it throws a runtime error after it finds the first solution: ==== solution 1 ===== (0, 2, 5, 7, 9, 4, 8, 1, 3, 6) terminate called after throwing an instance of '__shedskin_
12.
by dzorz 15y ago
140x speedup was compared to optimized python version. I've tried it vs. pypy now (version 1.5) - it is 20x faster.
13.
by dzorz 15y ago
next_permutation is in standard library (header algorithm).
14.
by dzorz 15y ago
I think this is an example where C++ really shines. The code is not much longer (44 vs 33 lines, although the output in python version is much nicer) than the python code and on my computer it is about 140x faster than python 2.7.1.
15.
by dzorz 15y ago
Wow, that is amazing. I honestly never tried that and assumed (because of short circuiting) that it can't be overloaded.
16.
by dzorz 15y ago
Actually you can't overload && although you can overload &.
17.
by dzorz 15y ago
April 1st?
18.
by dzorz 16y ago
What does LBS mean?
19.
by dzorz 16y ago
C++0x solves that issue by introducing rvalues.
20.
by dzorz 16y ago
IEEE is much more expensive.
21.
by dzorz 16y ago
> it's because expressions separated by a comma can be evaluated in any order (I believe). Expressions separated by the comma operator are always evaluated left to right. On the other hand function arguments (which are separated by comm
22.
by dzorz 16y ago
Although this version is very simple, concatenating and creating lists at runtime ruins performance (and it takes extra memory). Please make it a good example by doing a version of Quicksort with in-place partition.
23.
by dzorz 16y ago
> Still not convinced? Try this one (suggested by Mark Scarbrough ): #define DEVICE_COUNT 4 uint8 *szDevNames[DEVICE_COUNT] = { "SelectSet 5000", "SelectSet 7000"}; /* table has two entries of junk
24.
by dzorz 16y ago
I think uzbl is much more promising. It is built on WebKit and with little tweaks you can install it without X: http://lug.rose-hulman.edu/wiki/DirectFB
25.
by dzorz 16y ago
80% per month sounds crazy, but it is not even close to top 6: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation#Worst_Hyperinfla...
26.
by dzorz 16y ago
You can make a string class that interns strings. Language can express it, but std::string doesn't do it.
27.
by dzorz 16y ago
You could've used fixed32 instead of int32 (varint)... Just sayin' :-)
28.
by dzorz 16y ago
I understand that Xmonad probably is engineered like a large project, but I don't think it really qualifies as a large project. I'd say it is mid-size at best.
29.
by dzorz 16y ago
Ditto for X, Y, W.
30.
by dzorz 16y ago
> How much would I have after three years? Assuming a modest 10% return per year Is 10% really a modest return?

More ›