dynip

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dynip 4mo ago

   Your stuff also looks interesting for sure, you have some things that I have on my backlog. regarding my API keys I use python for the per-account access in bearer style and the TSIG keys work as per zone directly to PowerDNS. I only use th
2. 2.▲
   by dynip 4mo ago

   Back again, "works easily" was a bit of an understatement :D at least when securiting the zones with TSIG sha256 and moving keys around in a secure maner (I had previously used md5 because of compability with fortigate) there is f
3. 3.▲
   by dynip 4mo ago

   Did a manual validation, have a go :)
4. 4.▲
   by dynip 4mo ago

   I triggered a resend on all emails that was not verified so possibly you have a new validation token available.
5. 5.▲
   by dynip 4mo ago

   Give me you address and I will have a look
6. 6.▲
   by dynip 4mo ago

   Well, if your current gripe is no Let's encrypt with NO-IP, then you have just found something that stands out for you :)
7. 7.▲
   by dynip 4mo ago

   Marking as fixed, was a prior html change that i overlooked please have a go but right now it should not matter if you are logged in or not, the reset_token takes precedence. Thanks for reporting!
8. 8.▲
   by dynip 4mo ago

   Thanks, will look into what the best path would be. adding to the bugs list :)
9. 9.▲
   by dynip 4mo ago

   mycket viktigt :) Have not come in contact with Hickory DNS before, looks pretty solid
10. 10.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Hi, just wanted to check in again to clarify this a bit. TSIG keys are used for both the api and the direct dns update, this is what authenticates the request and tied to a specific domain. the bearer (long and short) are for the account an
11. 11.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    For sure!
12. 12.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Good points, don't be sorry. At this point in time there are knowns and unknowns, hopes and dreams and a big chunk of tech knowledge. Not as big on the design part but I think its ok for now
13. 13.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    It has to do with the .dev root zone that needs to have these as records, I am on it but it might take a few days to get those records up. Or it could be fast. Glad that you reported and I will report back when we expect it to work
14. 14.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Interesting, will do some digging on what sets them apart from the x amount of byod already precent. Thanks for letting me know!
15. 15.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Wow, that sounds like a great idea. I wanted it to be easy with the paddle integration but even that was a pain. Will look into it for sure, thanks!
16. 16.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Dynip.dev solves with dns challenge and you can download the full chain and key either via api or the dashboard. Check /docs
17. 17.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Hi, doing on mobile so short answer. To my knowledge they don't do RFC 2146 but rather base everything around a good api that they have. Like you say different types of records etc. And really, dynip came to be from fortinet/forti
18. 18.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Thanks for all the excellent comments and questions, I will be bringing my daughter for swimming lessons for a few hours and will continue looking at the threads when I return. Again, this guy <- happy
19. 19.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    point taken
20. 20.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    So many self replies :) happy to dive in a bit more at a later time to get your take on how the services work together. hope you found the /guide helpful
21. 21.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    This makes me really happy, like really really. It is the exact part of the /guide where things work together and not agaist or replace, synergy and happiness.
22. 22.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    I like to believe that there are different use cases that play with different needs, I don't know your exact needs on the topic but it sounds like you have figured out what needs you have on a technical basis. The idea is not really to
23. 23.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Something to look into for sure. thnks
24. 24.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Thanks, I will put it on my issues list to look into.
25. 25.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Thanks, appreciate it!
26. 26.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    It is not, the functionality is the same. I am trying to expand on the functionality to not only support a single setup. we support multiple update paths, validation, DNSSEC, Letsencrypt, byod domain etc. fleet management. It could be a bat
27. 27.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    Thanks for that, My intentions are to stick around for sure. It is genuinely difficult to get a point across in a very short amount of time that people that people will actually recognize. its like doom scrolling where you just get boored o
28. 28.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    I run dynip.dev, there are like dynip . com that is retired, then there is dyndns and 100 different players i am sure, I am looking out to see if this is good, can be better or useless to the general public.
29. 29.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    The hidden primary has a passive node, so saying multiple multiple maybe is an overstatement :) and yes, using a single postgres container
30. 30.▲
    by dynip 4mo ago

    I know right, and you would try different themes, go into the code, try to delete footer information that pointed back to the theme maker only to break the structure of everything.