dventimi

6 ms·

1.
by dventimi 5mo ago
It'll pay for itself!
2.
by dventimi 5mo ago
You can buy kits! http://www.dinermite.com/photos.html
3.
by dventimi 7mo ago
No. I'm stating a fact. You're free to state other facts if you like.
4.
by dventimi 7mo ago
That was a typo from a phone keyboard.
5.
by dventimi 7mo ago
Maybe I shouldn't. Something fishy may not be going on in it, and that would become a waste of time.
6.
by dventimi 7mo ago
I create a lot of applications with AI. I don't inspect any of the cod.
7.
by dventimi 7mo ago
Sure. I'm with you. I'm just puzzled by the article.
8.
by dventimi 7mo ago
"Cost" is a matter of personal judgement. Personally, using AI hasn't cost me anything.
9.
by dventimi 7mo ago
I don't have a contract with AI.
10.
by dventimi 7mo ago
I'll take that as a "no".
11.
by dventimi 7mo ago
Can you be more precise?
12.
by dventimi 7mo ago
So...software engineers become product managers? All of us? That's going to be an awful lot of product managers.
13.
by dventimi 7mo ago
So...what does it cost you?
14.
by dventimi 1y ago
> But that's not to say that they wouldn't be capable of adding safeguards on their end, not even on their MCP layer. Adding policies and narrowing access to whatever comes through MCP to the server and so on would be more assu
15.
by dventimi 1y ago
I don't consider cosmic inflation to be an observation. I consider it theory.
16.
by dventimi 1y ago
Suit yourself
17.
by dventimi 1y ago
Rubbish
18.
by dventimi 1y ago
"I think that's pretty uncalled for." I don't share your thoughts on the passage you're specifically referring to. It seems pretty anodyne to me. "I think it's pretty uncalled for to lump them in with &
19.
by dventimi 1y ago
"problematic" is a matter of degree, and is relative. Inflation is less problematic than some theories (e.g. "magic"). Are there any alternative theories that are less problematic than inflation, and yet also solve t
20.
by dventimi 1y ago
People and scientific instruments are made of "normal" (non-Dark) matter, which makes it easy to detect other "normal" matter (electrons, protons, quarks, photons, neutrinos, what-have-you). It's hard for us and ou
21.
by dventimi 1y ago
"It's really disheartening to see you make these theories into an "us vs them" ego contest." "I think your attitude is a perfect example of why science is said to advance one funeral at a time" Hey now
22.
by dventimi 1y ago
"the only reason it’s believed to exist at all is because a lot of otherwise well-understood equations and observations require it to exist." I mean...those are pretty good reasons. If a particular theory successfully predicts
23.
by dventimi 1y ago
Yeah, but it might've tamped down any perceived controversy even among laypeople, which would've saved many priceless electrons being spent debating the issue on the internet.
24.
by dventimi 1y ago
"If people understood that the last 200 years of science has shown that we are still utterly ignorant about the underpinnings of the universe" That's a bit of an exaggeration, don't you think? "But we are not ver
25.
by dventimi 1y ago
"We have concrete evidence that either a) a new type of matter and energy exists, or b) our theories need to be modified in some way." a new type of matter is a modification to our theories "Until we either detect dark m
26.
by dventimi 1y ago
You're not "wrong" per se as you're entitled to your views, but a fairly common alternative view goes something like this. Yes, while we sometimes do pursue scientific inquiry for its practical application to the bette
27.
by dventimi 1y ago
I agree with you. "Dark Matter" (and "Dark Energy") are colorful (colorless?) names that I think helped these theories diffuse into the popular consciousness at a time when popular interest in science was at a high-wate
28.
by dventimi 1y ago
I can't agree with this. No scientist says, "we know it's real because computer models but due to a fluke there's no dark matter in the solar system so we can't detect it." No scientist says, "we know it
29.
by dventimi 1y ago
I would guess, "It would take a very long time--possibly forever--because scientists don't typically become 'worried' by perceived shortfalls in theories, rather they become excited." Often, that excitement finds a
30.
by dventimi 1y ago
How do I get out of this chickensh*t outfit and onto that other timeline?

More ›