Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
duozerk
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
duozerk
6d ago
One has to remember they're crooks through and through. They're doing it by retoggling the checkbox because it offers them plausible deniability. "Oh, side effect of a recent update, silly us, we'll improve QA, sorry !&q
2.
▲
by
duozerk
2mo ago
> The places I worked were essentially white collar welfare. > One could do nothing and collect a paycheck. Outside of startups this accurately describes almost the entirety of private entities I've seen, at least this past decad
3.
▲
by
duozerk
2mo ago
That's easy, you ask a LLM to do it
4.
▲
by
duozerk
3mo ago
Wait patiently until their planet-sized computer gives them the answer they've been waiting for and then take their revenge
5.
▲
by
duozerk
3mo ago
The whole thing should ideally have a quick modal with hotkeys when you first open it (and a small button to bring it up again if needed).
6.
▲
by
duozerk
4mo ago
Non-profit Open Source distributions also and already package and verify open source packages (arguably often with a higher quality of analysis than Red Hat). You pay red hat for compliance reasons (availability of a support you'll nev
7.
▲
by
duozerk
5mo ago
In other words it's a great clickbait title, yet still a bad title.
8.
▲
by
duozerk
7mo ago
Thank you ! I imagined it was a cultural thing, good to know.
9.
▲
by
duozerk
7mo ago
> Anecdotally, of my two EU (massive legacy French) banks, neither requires a mobile app. SMS all the way. My wording was bad, sorry; but try to install their app just once. After that, I'd bet you won't ever be able to go back
10.
▲
by
duozerk
7mo ago
> Also, what kind of banking are people doing that requires an app? I genuinely don't know what it could be. Close to every bank in the EU requires their user to have an app, for MFA (both for logging in and for validating transacti
11.
▲
by
duozerk
7mo ago
> I would only use it in a sauce if I needed to accommodate a vegan guest. As an alternative, I've found methylcellulose to be pretty good for thickening my vegan homemade sauces (mainly tried it because I use it for other stuff, li
12.
▲
by
duozerk
7mo ago
Maybe google is an exception (but then again, maybe that payout was part marketing to draw more researchers).
13.
▲
by
duozerk
7mo ago
I read this often, and I guess it could be true, but those kinds of transaction would presumably go through DNM / forums like BF and the like. Which means crypto, and full anonymity. So either the buyer trusts the seller to deliver, or
14.
▲
by
duozerk
7mo ago
> That's pretty bad! I wonder what kind of bounty went to the researcher. I'd be surprised if it's above 20K$. Bug bounties rewards are usually criminally low; doubly so when you consider the efforts usually involved in no
15.
▲
by
duozerk
7mo ago
A more reasonable response than my admittedly slightly aggressive comment deserved. Indeed, we'll see.
16.
▲
by
duozerk
7mo ago
So you did use LLMs to write at least part of the software. I imagine you feel no shame, but it would be nice to at least mention it on the github page. It's a security risk. As for your question, I don't know about the person you
17.
▲
by
duozerk
8mo ago
> Something that goes beyond our daily vices of politics and religion Religion maybe, and Wikipedia is indeed pretty awesome for many topics, but politics is THE bad example here. Much of the political - especially geopolitical - content
18.
▲
by
duozerk
1y ago
There is no "intelligence" in LLMs; they're text predictors. As far as I can tell the whole LLM technology has limited applications in entertainment and that's about it. "Hallucinations" (even that term is prob
19.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
My bad, thank you !
20.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
As someone who exclusively uses emacs for all their editing, some nice topics there; though a bit miffed it's all video only. Although this, from the page linked, was pretty fun: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urcL86Up
21.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
Also misogynistic and homophobic.
22.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
And jailbreak that Kindle and install KOReader on it, too; now it supports epub in a much more awesome reader app (not to mention having the capability to install any gtk app - I have a term emulator with ssh on mine, among others). And you
23.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
> Sailpoint Oh gods, the painful flashbacks.
24.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
Much of the soil in Russia that will warm is indeed acidic and largely inexploitable, which I suspect is what you were getting at; to their credit though, they picked an area that isn't (IIRC). Not that it changes much.
25.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
We're at +1.5C, more or less, and growing the usual grapes in France - of all places - is already becoming much harder (they keep dying of frost after waking up due to wild temperature swings). At +5C, there is no growing food in any s
26.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
You can't grow food for a large population when average planetary temps are at +5C. It doesn't mean it's locally always +5C warmer than it used to be; it means you're seeing insane temperature swings in a matter of days,
27.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
Giving you the benefit of the doubt you're not trolling, it seems you're laboring under the belief that, say, "2C of warming" means it'll always be 2C hotter where people live. It does not. It means the mean will
28.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
At 4C of heating, you cannot grow food in any reasonable quantity with any reliability, period. 4C is the collapse of modern civilization at the very least (in fact likely earlier due to increased geopolitical instability and tensions due
29.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
Despite the IPCC being very conservative/optimistic in their scenarios, this is in fact in line with their reports; admittedly my comment above might be badly worded - when I said "near-term", I meant "in the upcoming tw
30.
▲
by
duozerk
2y ago
> happening VERY slowly > failing to move away from the cost in the next 100 years Unless you're a time-traveler from the 50s who has somehow managed to post here, there is no excuse for this type of disinformation these days. Me
More ›