dugidugout

13 ms·

1.
by dugidugout 3mo ago
Were you not "[being] cute" yourself? I don't like it, but they did have to goad you into giving some substance.
2.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
What point are you making here? The author of the review doesn't seem to be affiliated with any keyboard. Are you suggesting the distributor of the MoErgo Glove80 provided the author with this image and/or a general narrative?
3.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
Regarding guns and chat bots. You've said as much and the origin of the discussion says as much. Where does anyone suggest they are referring to use of LLMs in military deployments other than you?
4.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
> a chat bot We are clearly not discussing deployments in military campaigns.The suit in question is specifically regarding "ChatGPT" used conversationally.
5.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
> The store obviously has an obligation to hand over either money or the goods, but it's not clear that obligation is transient to anyone that ends up with the goods. It is extremely clear. You are just detailing the buffer being us
6.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
This line is basically the review in miniature. In answering whether Nguyen's argument holds, Runciman decides Nguyen isn't talented enough to be worth judging, then judges him anyway. A book about scoring systems gets scored on t
7.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
Being that can be understood is language. The previous commenter is making an particular argument for how we can improve this understanding. They didn't suggest we should use less familiar words, but different familiar words. Why is th
8.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
I believe it was emergent from FPS gaming culture, particularly following the popularity of Apex Legends. In Apex Legends you have an energy shield which serves as a buffer of hit points. When playing cooperatively it is useful to communica
9.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
What did you find slightly imprecise?
10.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
Why not link the study?
11.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
Drama is the moment a person discovers their most private feelings are not private at all, but historical forces passing through them.
12.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
Hopefully the capital owners care to tell the difference.
13.
by dugidugout 4mo ago
I personally could not stomach the clocktower. I may just be bad at platforming, but the stage felt jarringly frustrating compared to the pleasant frustration I was having with the rest of the games challenges. After my 10th or so time gett
14.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
This is what I suggest too, what a good way of putting it! Some people have very funny ways at looking at the most mundane context in my mind. It would be a shame if I didnt spend time sharing my funny head in ways that can't be captur
15.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
I don't mean to detract from your point, but regarding your footnote, you seemingly have. Unless it is in your writing style to make direct asides about how one may infer your message was procured.
16.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
It does poorly on creative concepts as well. I attempted to explore the works of Kinoko Nasu/TYPE-MOON through its characters and the relationships across works and it was mostly nonsense. Sure it had some broad relations correct, but
17.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
This was a very depressing read.
18.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
In your frame, why would you be so quick to cut theatrics? Or is this what the kids are calling "jester-maxxing"
19.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
There are many ways to interpret this, yes. I only mean to disrupt the framing you keep asserting of good and bad faith, I'm still not sure I understand what you are getting at. No one is assuming the output is strictly low quality fro
20.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
> But for the other 95% of people, being able to just say "ok can you make it look more modern" and have 4 variants in 5 mins, (like me) Figma will lose users like me. Perhaps this phrasing is what invited the interpretation yo
21.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
For the tech bros, the tokens are the actions and the prompts are the words.
22.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
And I'll go one better, you haven't said anything here at all, you've just left a representation of what you understand to be saying.
23.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
I think there is some truth here, but implementation is just very messy in any case. Look at NixOS for an example of the insane amount of time a democratic structure demands on a projects governing body and how this ultimately shaped this s
24.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
No this was much more substantial and I quite enjoyed it, I was thinking along these lines when offering the comparison, but you have a flowery way to put it. That is to say, this is the first I'm hearing of this Crowley guy directly,
25.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
Mhm.
26.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
Blah I need to get around to this! I often gesture towards this phenomenology when religious folk casually attempt to claim "spirit" as some form of belief they hold over me. I honestly don't know if I've developed the p
27.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
I think Heidegger provides a framing for why these are just musings in, as you put it, a firm entrenchment and the whole ordeal is looking quite bleak. I honestly can't imagine a way out of the technological frame and I am simply not s
28.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
These don't sound like convincing indicators of being an "effective charlatan". Am I to see the Notorious B.I.G. in the same frame?
29.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
In the data science scenario you should just have proper tooling, for you it sounds like a REPL the agent can interface with. I do this with nREPL/CIDER; in Python-land a Jupyter kernel over MCP maybe. For stateful introspection where
30.
by dugidugout 5mo ago
To be clear, I am ADHD (executive-type) and am empathetic to my friend. All considered I am quite fond of my time spent with them. But in regards to developing a model for ones character I don't think it is very helpful to allow disabi

More ›