Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dtrizzle
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
dtrizzle
9mo ago
The plain text idea is brilliant and something I've been thinking about for a while. If they could do this, it would reduce storage and transmission costs of the courts various case management systems. I would increase the speed of the
2.
▲
by
dtrizzle
2y ago
Quick note: "On May 6, 2024, the California State Court accept our claim." The court where you filed your lawsuit is a federal court, not a state court. Specifically, it's the U.S. District Court - Northern District of Calif
3.
▲
by
dtrizzle
3y ago
Cal, not Carl.
4.
▲
by
dtrizzle
4y ago
I agree with selling to corporations. However, most big law lawyers will need a higher level of PDF functionality. At a quick glance, I notice that the tools can't manipulate bookmarks, which are required for electronic filing in most
5.
▲
by
dtrizzle
4y ago
There is a slight mistake above. The person who represents Coca Cola may not be a licensed attorney, even if they work for the corporation. (See Code of Civ. Proc., § 116.530, subd. (a) and (b).) Corporations typically send a non-attorney m
6.
▲
by
dtrizzle
4y ago
This has been an issue in criminal prosecutions. Breath machine: You are over a .08 BAC. Defendant: No I wasn't. Let me see the source code. Courts and companies: NO! It's secret. [1] [1] https://www.criminallegalnews.o
7.
▲
by
dtrizzle
4y ago
Looks like the people who are grandfathered in are people who paid for web access. If you purchased the Android or iOS app (like me), you are not grandfathered in and do not get a free plus account. Source: https://blog.pocketcas
8.
▲
by
dtrizzle
4y ago
The idea that encryption algorithms need to be well tested over time is why many security experts do not trust Telegram's encryption algorithm (MTProto).
9.
▲
by
dtrizzle
4y ago
You are not wrong. But in this case there was a significant amount of contemporaneous reporting when Ive left, predating this book.
10.
▲
by
dtrizzle
4y ago
The iPhone. The end.
11.
▲
by
dtrizzle
5y ago
No Gmail.
12.
▲
by
dtrizzle
5y ago
Zune!
13.
▲
by
dtrizzle
5y ago
The Federal Rules of Evidence permit a judge to question witnesses in addition to the parties. See Rule 614 linked below. And I think you mean plaintiff. A prosecutor generally refers to a lawyer representing the government in a criminal pr
14.
▲
by
dtrizzle
6y ago
This project reminded me a proselint, which appears to be a similar style checker. Sadly, that project appears to have been inactive for at least three years. https://github.com/amperser/proselint
15.
▲
by
dtrizzle
6y ago
They still have a tremendous amount of power and other companies should still fear them. For example, Microsoft Teams versus Slack.
16.
▲
by
dtrizzle
6y ago
Microsoft might not be the leader that it once was but they've done a very good job of reinventing themselves. It's a little unfair to call them dead.
17.
▲
The ‘heartbreaking’ decrease in black homeownership
(washingtonpost.com)
11 points
by
dtrizzle
8y ago
|
1 comments
18.
▲
by
dtrizzle
8y ago
Non-paywall: http://archive.is/j6f3G
19.
▲
Honda Took Pride Doing Everything Itself. The Cost of Tech Made That Impossible
(wsj.com)
2 points
by
dtrizzle
8y ago
|
1 comments
20.
▲
by
dtrizzle
8y ago
ghost.js
21.
▲
by
dtrizzle
9y ago
The warrant requirement for content online, while good for privacy, absolutely hobbles criminal defendants. I pointed out this troubling issue years ago in a similar thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11073479 .
22.
▲
How Social Media Giants Side with Prosecutors in Criminal Cases
(themarshallproject.org)
1 points
by
dtrizzle
9y ago
|
1 comments
23.
▲
Portland Authorizes Subpoena to Uber for “Greyball Playbook”
(portlandmercury.com)
2 points
by
dtrizzle
9y ago
|
0 comments
24.
▲
by
dtrizzle
9y ago
I'm pretty sure the Arizona legislature changed the law to make it clear that Zestimates were lawful. http://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/must-zillow-the-...
25.
▲
by
dtrizzle
9y ago
Thomas’s dissent is not about whether as a policy matter, someone should receive their money back. I suspect everyone thinks the Petitioners’ should get refunds. Rather, it’s about whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
26.
▲
by
dtrizzle
10y ago
"However, in the second trial the small claims cap of $10,000 is removed and the judge can potentially award much more money in damages to the plaintiff." This is wrong. $10,000 is the absolute damages cap in small claims court an
27.
▲
by
dtrizzle
11y ago
In California: The DA must follow this rule: http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-1054-1.html . The DA also has obligations under Brady v. Maryland: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_cas
28.
▲
by
dtrizzle
11y ago
> Prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence, including the video you're describing Not quite. Prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence that is in the possession of the prosecution team. In terms of the example I gave, fac
29.
▲
by
dtrizzle
11y ago
Here are some California cases that discuss the issue, but I'm pretty sure federal law and the law of most states is similar: The prosecution has no “duty to conduct the defendant’s investigation for him.” People v. Verdugo, 50 Cal. 4t
30.
▲
by
dtrizzle
11y ago
See here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11075110 In short, you can do that. But in real life, you typically won't get the data. That's why police and prosecutor bust down your door instead of mailing you a
More ›