dsifry

5 ms·

1.
by dsifry 2mo ago
This is why I built Metaswarm and Metareview and why they work so well, and the are building and supporting production infrastructures and sites for months on end. Give them a try: https://github.com/dsifry/metaswarm a
2.
by dsifry 2mo ago
Just got an alert that we would owe $12 Billion. BILLION. After getting me out of bed and a breathless 15 minutes of investigation, I found: https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status#billingconsole_1... which notes t
3.
by dsifry 7mo ago
I have been helping people get onboarded with Claude Code and the orchestrator I wrote called Metaswarm [1) and the response has been way beyond my expectations. But don't take my word for it, try it out for yourself, it is MIT license
4.
Show HN: Metaswarm: Production-ready agent swarms, MIT license(dsifry.github.io)
1 points by dsifry 8mo ago|0 comments
5.
Show HN: 127 PRs to Prod this wknd with 18 AI agents: metaswarm. MIT licensed(github.com)
5 points by dsifry 8mo ago|2 comments
6.
by dsifry 8mo ago
Some github comments are marked as sctionable, some have threads and suggestions, some are suggestions or are nitpicks. This provides you with a deterministic, reliable red/green approach that you cn use to enforce your policy. Give it
7.
by dsifry 8mo ago
Yeah, it is about making sure that EVERY actionable PR comment gets addressed - whwther by fixing, resolving, creating a new issue, commenting that it is a will not fix, or blocking for human review - and then giving you a clear determinist
8.
by dsifry 8mo ago
Just to be clear - the hook is deterministic, but the subagent running with an mcp server loaded is not - and for medium/large PRs, it can run out of context window or just forget what it is trying to do and get lazy and say 'Ever
9.
by dsifry 8mo ago
I found that it has improved overall code quality significantly, at the cost of somewhat slower velocity. But it has meant fewer interruptions where the ai is just waiting for me, or saying "Everything is ready!" only to find that
10.
by dsifry 8mo ago
Lol, I thought it did a reasonably good job, but to each their own - this was the difference between releasing the project so others could use it with decent documentation, or not releasing and just using it internally. :)
11.
by dsifry 8mo ago
Exactly right!
12.
by dsifry 8mo ago
No, it just prepares the PR - it doesn't automatically merge. That would be very dangerous, imho!
13.
by dsifry 8mo ago
That's EXACTLY right. Ready to merge is an important gate, but it is very stupid to just merge everything without further checks/testing by a human!
14.
by dsifry 8mo ago
Right! It doesn't assume that all comments are actionable, or need to be worked on. However, if you allow anyone to comment on your PRs, it could be a malicious vector. So don't let anyone review PRs on projects that you care abou
15.
by dsifry 8mo ago
That's why I intentionally don't have this hooked into an ingest flow - you still get control over what issues/stories you want the agent swarm to work on... Just now, I can know that the code that was written has been review
16.
by dsifry 8mo ago
Yup! Software engineers aren't going to be out of work anytime soon, but I'm acting more like a CTO or VPE with a team of agents now, rather than just a single dev with a smart intern.
17.
by dsifry 8mo ago
Sure, but that mcp still missed actionable comments that are marked as Out of Scope or Outside the PR - and this doesn't require having the context window loss of having another mcp instantiated, either. Anyway, give gtg a competitive
18.
by dsifry 8mo ago
I did! The issue however, is having a clear, deterministic method of defining when the code review was 'done'. So the hooks can fire off subagents, but they are non-deterministic and often miss vital code review comments - especia
19.
Show HN: I built a tool to assist AI agents to know when a PR is good to go(dsifry.github.io)
45 points by dsifry 8mo ago|35 comments
20.
by dsifry 13y ago
Pure awesomeness.
21.
by dsifry 15y ago
This is awesome.
22.
by dsifry 15y ago
Just used the service and had a great chat with Chap, one of the founders. There's something qualitatively different when you're talking to someone using voice - it makes it easier to articulate some of the bigger questions that aren't just
23.
by dsifry 16y ago
Of course, that's completely true - and all the more reason to follow your love and passion if you happen to be privileged by luck of birth, family, and genetics. I think that this is true of many HN readers and certainly describes me. I'm
24.
by dsifry 16y ago
Just do what you love. Period. I've had times in my life when that was programming - and it got me a long way, and I loved doing it while I did it. Then I felt the challenge of learning how to build a business. So I made a choice, and stepp
25.
by dsifry 16y ago
That's gotta be one of the craziest post titles I've read on HN lately ;-)
26.
by dsifry 16y ago
Technorati was a side project for me.
27.
Ask HN: What sub-$400 2nd monitor should I get for coding?
12 points by dsifry 17y ago|17 comments
28.
by dsifry 18y ago
The beta message is back in there. Thanks!
29.
by dsifry 18y ago
Great feedback, you make some very good points. This is, after all, what a beta is all about - to get out there, learn as much as we can, and iterate iterate iterate. Thanks for being brutally honest, this is just what we want to learn! Dav
30.
by dsifry 18y ago
Good point. We actually had the beta label in there, but somehow it got dropped out when we did our final QA. We'll get it back in there.

More ›